From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (eventually for linux-next?)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:54:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <758.1224201299@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081016224641.GA17413@us.ibm.com>
Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> David, since this consumes your patch, I wasn't sure whether it was
> appropriate to put your signed-off-by on here or not. I decided
> doing so was the worse of the potential offenses...
The way I think I'd've done it is to include my patch description and
signed-off-by then list your additional changes (just keep on incrementing the
point numbers) and your signed-off-by.
> - new_user = alloc_uid(current->nsproxy->user_ns, new->uid);
> + new_user = alloc_uid(current_user()->user_ns, new->uid);
That should be current_user_ns() rather than current_user()->user_ns. I made
this change before adding the macro.
> + key_put(new->thread_keyring);
> + new->thread_keyring = NULL;
Superfluous. copy_creds() does this immediately upon return.
Also, in copy_creds(), should the session and process keyrings be discarded if
CLONE_NEWUSER is set? Actually, I think that should be dealt with by a patch
to deal with namespacing keyrings as the user-default keyrings need to be
namespaced rather than here.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-16 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-16 22:46 [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (eventually for linux-next?) Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-16 23:17 ` James Morris
2008-10-16 23:54 ` David Howells [this message]
2008-10-20 18:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=758.1224201299@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.