All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] dim: Try git-merge --ff-only before git-rebase -i when updating branches.
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:12:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75cfd30e-19dd-e742-5102-ca743e4b9fea@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h96gxev2.fsf@intel.com>

Op 07-12-16 om 10:33 schreef Jani Nikula:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> When a branch can be fast-forwarded, try it first before rebasing.
>> This will prevent a whole lot of editor windows opening with 'noop'
>> when running dim ub.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  dim | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dim b/dim
>> index fa63ae8c8a79..b2e6841e23d7 100755
>> --- a/dim
>> +++ b/dim
>> @@ -1286,9 +1286,7 @@ function dim_update_branches
>>  		repo=`branch_to_repo $branch`
>>  		remote=`repo_to_remote $repo`
>>  
>> -		if git diff --quiet $remote/$branch; then
>> -			$DRY git rebase
>> -		else
>> +		if ! $DRY git merge --ff-only ; then
> What does it assume for branches to merge when none are provided? Would
> it be better to be explicit?
>
> Thanks for this, I've been meaning to do this forever...

Hm I guess explicit might be better, what about this?
------8<-------
When a branch can be fast-forwarded, try it first before rebasing.
This will prevent a whole lot of editor windows opening with 'noop'
when running dim ub.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
diff --git a/dim b/dim
index fa63ae8c8a79..e0551ace54e4 100755
--- a/dim
+++ b/dim
@@ -1286,9 +1286,7 @@ function dim_update_branches
 		repo=`branch_to_repo $branch`
 		remote=`repo_to_remote $repo`
 
-		if git diff --quiet $remote/$branch; then
-			$DRY git rebase
-		else
+		if ! $DRY git merge --ff-only $remote/$branch; then
 			$DRY git rebase -i
 		fi
 	done

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-06  9:48 [PATCH] dim: Try git-merge --ff-only before git-rebase -i when updating branches Maarten Lankhorst
2016-12-07  9:33 ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-07 17:12   ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2016-12-07 18:09     ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75cfd30e-19dd-e742-5102-ca743e4b9fea@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.