From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: subhashj@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
evgreen@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: Remove all direct calls to qcom-ufs phy
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:12:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75d4820c-d154-cc5c-e7b6-72defdfdce5e@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904101719.18049-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Hi Vivek,
On Tuesday 04 September 2018 03:47 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Cleaning up the ufs-qcom host further to remove all direct calls
> into qcom-ufs driver.
> Only phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm phy handles these direct calls from ufs host
> and this phy is not used in any supported qcom platform in current kernel.
> So, while we free up the host from all the ufs_qcom_phy_*() API calls
> we should declare 20nm phy as broken.
> For this we fork out couple of configs from PHY_QCOM_UFS -
> PHY_QCOM_UFS_14NM and PHY_QCOM_UFS_20NM out of which we declare
> PHY_QCOM_UFS_20NM as 'broken'.
>
> This series helps in a clean use of ufs phy support for sdm845
> and further SoCs that will also use phy-qcom-qmp phy driver.
I think this entire series should go via linux-phy tree. I need ACK from UFS
MAINTAINER for the second patch.
Thanks
Kishon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
<vinholikatti@gmail.com>, <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <subhashj@codeaurora.org>, <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
<evgreen@chromium.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: Remove all direct calls to qcom-ufs phy
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:12:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75d4820c-d154-cc5c-e7b6-72defdfdce5e@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904101719.18049-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Hi Vivek,
On Tuesday 04 September 2018 03:47 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Cleaning up the ufs-qcom host further to remove all direct calls
> into qcom-ufs driver.
> Only phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm phy handles these direct calls from ufs host
> and this phy is not used in any supported qcom platform in current kernel.
> So, while we free up the host from all the ufs_qcom_phy_*() API calls
> we should declare 20nm phy as broken.
> For this we fork out couple of configs from PHY_QCOM_UFS -
> PHY_QCOM_UFS_14NM and PHY_QCOM_UFS_20NM out of which we declare
> PHY_QCOM_UFS_20NM as 'broken'.
>
> This series helps in a clean use of ufs phy support for sdm845
> and further SoCs that will also use phy-qcom-qmp phy driver.
I think this entire series should go via linux-phy tree. I need ACK from UFS
MAINTAINER for the second patch.
Thanks
Kishon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-25 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 10:17 [PATCH 0/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: Remove all direct calls to qcom-ufs phy Vivek Gautam
2018-09-04 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove stale methods that handle ref clk Vivek Gautam
2018-09-24 17:23 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-09-25 5:40 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-04 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi/ufs: qcom: Remove ufs_qcom_phy_*() calls from host Vivek Gautam
2018-09-24 17:24 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-09-25 9:52 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26 0:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-09-26 6:14 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-04 10:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] phy: qcom-ufs: Declare 20nm qcom ufs qmp phy as Broken Vivek Gautam
2018-09-24 17:29 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-09-24 8:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: Remove all direct calls to qcom-ufs phy Vivek Gautam
2018-09-25 6:42 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2018-09-25 6:42 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75d4820c-d154-cc5c-e7b6-72defdfdce5e@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.