From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] ARM: msm multiplatform support Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 23:52:50 +0100 Message-ID: <7616599.hAEbVQmATE@wuerfel> References: <1425497592-1831064-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:50156 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbbCHWx0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:53:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , David Brown , Daniel Walker , Bryan Huntsman , Stephen Boyd , Tim Bird , Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Srinivas Kandagatla On Thursday 05 March 2015 17:40:18 Ulf Hansson wrote: > The goal from my side is to entirely remove this mmc driver and > instead convert to use the mmci host driver. > > If I understand correctly, the current big blocker to reach that goal > is the DMA driver, since it's not converted to the DMA engine API? Do > you know if that's a correct statement? Yes, I think that is correct. As I wrote in the patch description, after we remove the serial-hs driver, msm_sdcc is the only user of the private MSM DMA API. I wasn't aware that this device is compatible with mmci, but that certainly simplifies things. > Anyway, I suppose this patchset can be considered as step in the right > direction, even if I don't like to take patches for the msm_sdcc.c. Ok. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 23:52:50 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/18] ARM: msm multiplatform support In-Reply-To: References: <1425497592-1831064-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <7616599.hAEbVQmATE@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 05 March 2015 17:40:18 Ulf Hansson wrote: > The goal from my side is to entirely remove this mmc driver and > instead convert to use the mmci host driver. > > If I understand correctly, the current big blocker to reach that goal > is the DMA driver, since it's not converted to the DMA engine API? Do > you know if that's a correct statement? Yes, I think that is correct. As I wrote in the patch description, after we remove the serial-hs driver, msm_sdcc is the only user of the private MSM DMA API. I wasn't aware that this device is compatible with mmci, but that certainly simplifies things. > Anyway, I suppose this patchset can be considered as step in the right > direction, even if I don't like to take patches for the msm_sdcc.c. Ok. Arnd