From: <paul.chavent@fnac.net>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: What represent 646345728 bytes
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:08:24 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7618835.18201265033304935.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1112> (raw)
Hi
I'am writing an application that write a stream of pictures of fixed size on a disk.
My app run on a self integrated gnu/linux (based on a 2.6.31.6-rt19 kernel).
My media is formated with
# mke2fs -t ext4 -L DATA -O large_file,^has_journal,extent -v /dev/sda3
[...]
And it is mounted with
# mount -t ext4 /dev/sda3 /var/data/
EXT4-fs (sda3): no journal
EXT4-fs (sda3): delayed allocation enabled
EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
EXT4-fs (sda3): mounted filesystem without journal
My app opens the file with "O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_SYNC | O_DIRECT" flags.
Each write takes ~4.2ms for 304K (it is very good since it is the write bandwidth of my hard drive). There is a write every 100ms.
But every exactly 646345728 bytes, the write takes ~46ms.
I had the same problem with ext2 but every ~620M (the amount wasn't so constant).
Also i tryed to "posix_fallocate" with (eg 2G), and the first write overhead comes at this limit. I would like to avoid to preallocate.
I suppose it is a kind of block allocation issue. But i would like to have your opinion :
- what is exatcly this amount of bytes ?
- can i do something for having a "constant" write time from the user space point of view ?
- is it a "probem" only for me ?
Thank you for your reading.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-01 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 14:08 paul.chavent [this message]
2010-02-01 15:06 ` What represent 646345728 bytes Eric Sandeen
2010-02-01 17:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-02-01 17:34 ` Eric Sandeen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-01 17:06 paul.chavent
2010-02-01 20:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-01 22:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-01 23:01 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7618835.18201265033304935.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1112 \
--to=paul.chavent@fnac.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.