From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JoBc3-0006Er-At
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:04:20 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JoBbl-00065M-SM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:04:09 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoBbl-0005s1-89
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:04:01 -0400
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1JoBRI-0005sM-HQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:53:12 -0400
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3210485pyb.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0804212253l69706a65l89d675b8dc92f8f2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:53:10 +0200
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU website
In-Reply-To: <fb249edb0804212029v40aa035are3e23c5fd62c455b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080421002911.64939.qmail@web3414.mail.ogk.yahoo.co.jp>
	<FE0C9DA3-EA3F-478C-96A0-4FCAD69B0B14@kronenberg.org>
	<20080421214300.GA20856@miranda.arrow>
	<fb249edb0804212029v40aa035are3e23c5fd62c455b@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 4/22/08, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also the "Host CPU support" chart on Status page is now very wrong.

Indeed :)  BTW I am wondering if anyone is working on ARM host
support.


Laurent