From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0AWs-0006ZX-RN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 12:29:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0AWm-0005VH-Om for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 12:29:01 -0400 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:59336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0AWm-0005U9-Fh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 12:28:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:28:50 -0400 (EDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Message-ID: <765120244.1305129.1462897730889.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20160510191834-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1462896240-30999-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20160510191834-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] RFCv3: vhost-user: simple reconnection support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: marcandre lureau , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Tetsuya Mukawa , jonshin@cisco.com, Ilya Maximets , Yuanhan Liu Hi ----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:03:50PM +0200, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wro= te: > > From: Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > In a previous series "RFCv2: vhost-user: shutdown and reconnection", I > > proposed to add a new slave request to handle graceful shutdown, for > > both qemu configuration, server or client, while keeping the guest > > running with link down status. >=20 > OK so I would say patches 1-4 are bugfixes, looks like they > can be Cc stable even? 4 is being used by 5 and 10. 2-3 are only for testing. 4-8 are nice to have as they avoid obvious problems/crashes when handling d= isconnected state and add basic reconnection checks. 9 was already considered for stable by Eric in a previous series 10 would be good to have if 1 is accepted, to check the minimum works as ex= pected