From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com>
To: Joao Marcos Costa <joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com>
Cc: michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, quentin.schulz@cherry.de,
marek.vasut@mailbox.org, festevam@gmail.com,
khem.raj@oss.qualcomm.com, ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/1] u-boot-tools: drop yaml in DT validation
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 18:24:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <766ed885-2fd7-4752-8049-a8118a916c70@rootcommit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9910b568-95f2-43ce-921f-3556482854d1@bootlin.com>
Hi João Marcos
On 5/19/26 3:51 PM, Joao Marcos Costa wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On 5/18/26 21:12, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>> Hi João Marcos
>>
>> FYI, building the "qemuriscv64" machine is still broken on OE-core
>> (master), and it's seems likely to be related to this change;
>>
>> | /usr/bin/ld: scripts/dtc/yamltree.o: in function `dt_to_yaml':
>> | yamltree.c:(.text+0x8fa): undefined reference to
>> `yaml_emitter_initialize'
>> | /usr/bin/ld: yamltree.c:(.text+0x905): undefined reference to
>> `yaml_emitter_set_output_file'
>> | /usr/bin/ld: yamltree.c:(.text+0x912): undefined reference to
>> `yaml_stream_start_event_initialize'
>> | /usr/bin/ld: yamltree.c:(.text+0x91d): undefined reference to
>> `yaml_emitter_emit'
> (...)
>
> This looks very much as the case described here:
>
> https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/commit/807bcd844afeadbfe47ac132524cc7e3b699bc46
>
>
> Which could explain why it wasn't caught in the autobuilder, and why
> I'm not able to reproduce it in my container that does not natively
> provides this lib (i.e., no /usr/include/yaml.h).
Indeed, I had the "libyaml-dev" package on my Debian 13 system, and the
problem goes away when I remove it.
So, this explains why our autobuilder didn't catch this and I'm the only
one who seems to be impacted.
So, this is a U-Boot issue. However, I wonder why the problem is still
there while the above commit (present in 2026.04 that we're using) is
supposed to fix it...
Thanks again
Cheers
Michael.
--
Root Commit
Embedded Linux Training and Consulting
https://rootcommit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 18:06 [PATCH v2 0/1] u-boot-tools: drop yaml in DT validation João Marcos Costa
2026-04-29 18:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " João Marcos Costa
[not found] ` <18AAE61C950BAD92.2435051@lists.openembedded.org>
2026-04-30 21:29 ` [OE-core] " Joao Marcos Costa
2026-05-07 20:05 ` [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/1] " Ricardo de Araujo (Salveti)
2026-05-18 19:12 ` Michael Opdenacker
2026-05-19 13:23 ` Joao Marcos Costa
2026-05-19 13:51 ` Joao Marcos Costa
2026-05-19 16:24 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
2026-05-20 8:08 ` Joao Marcos Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=766ed885-2fd7-4752-8049-a8118a916c70@rootcommit.com \
--to=michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com \
--cc=khem.raj@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@mailbox.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.