From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: twoerner@gmail.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4 06/10] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: add wic to SDK_FEATURES
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:40:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76897f53eff588bb67e0e5f0b04dac7be6fa0ac2.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724090146.19924-7-twoerner@gmail.com>
Hi Trevor,
Firstly, thanks for the patches, this is the right general direction
but we need to get the details right and I think there are a few tweaks
needed to make this as usable as we need it.
In 5/10 you introduce SDK_FEATURES and document it as behaving as
IMAGE_FEATURES, bit as implemented below, it wouldn't.
[cont. below]
On Fri, 2026-07-24 at 05:01 -0400, Trevor Woerner via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> wic is useful from an installed SDK for assembling or inspecting a wic
> image, but adding it is not free: nativesdk-wic pulls in the tools it
> runs (parted, gptfdisk, dosfstools, mtools, bmaptool, grub, btrfs-tools,
> squashfs-tools, e2fsprogs, util-linux, tar, erofs-utils, and syslinux on
> x86). Most SDKs do not need any of that, so wic should not be in the
> host packagegroup unconditionally.
>
> Gate wic in the host packagegroup on the "wic" SDK feature, which is not
> enabled by default. A configuration that wants wic in its SDK adds the
> "wic" feature to SDK_FEATURES and gets a working wic, together with the
> tools it invokes, in the SDK.
>
> AI-Generated: codex/claude-opus 4.8 (xhigh)
> Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes in v4:
> - split out from the v3 "add wic via a new SDK_FEATURES lever" patch:
> this patch now only wires wic to the "wic" SDK feature
> ---
> .../packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> index 51e48f250b19..c2974a57fe3e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host.bb
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ RDEPENDS:${PN} = "\
> nativesdk-bison \
> nativesdk-flex \
> nativesdk-perl-module-integer \
> + ${@bb.utils.contains('SDK_FEATURES', 'wic', 'nativesdk-wic', '', d)} \
> "
This means that the recipe/package would rebuild every time you change
SDK_FEATURES. IMAGE_FEATURES can be set per image recipe, this would
mean SDK_FEATURES can be set once, globally.
This is why SDK_TOOLCHAIN_LANGS is handled at the class level in
populate_sdk_base.bbclass. It looks for values and pulls in a
packagegroup for a given feature. You can then change the langs on a
per sdk basis.
Instead of the above, you could add:
${@bb.utils.contains('SDK_FEATURES', 'wic', 'nativesdk-wic', '', d)}
there, probably for TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK.
Generally we'd create a packagegroup if there are multiple items being
gated on a config. wic is probably fine, sbom might need a
packagegroup.
Other feedback on the series:
* patch 5/10 should have a subject prefix of bitbake.conf as
it doesn't touch nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host
* We need to migrate SDK_TOOLCHAIN_LANGS to SDK_FEATURES,
probably using BB_RENAMED_VARIABLES
Are these tweaks you're ok to make?
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 9:01 [PATCH v4 00/10] wic: ship its tools, and add an SDK_FEATURES lever Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] wic-tools: move bootloader firmware staging into the wic oe-selftest Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] wic: add runtime dependencies on the tools it invokes Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] oeqa/selftest/wic: drop dead COREBASE/scripts wic lookup Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] oeqa/selftest/wic: drop redundant per-test PATH overrides Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: add an SDK_FEATURES lever Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: add wic to SDK_FEATURES Trevor Woerner
2026-07-30 10:40 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2026-07-30 11:48 ` [OE-core] " Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: add an sbom SDK feature Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: add an lldb " Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host: gate qemu behind SDK_FEATURES Trevor Woerner
2026-07-24 9:21 ` Patchtest results for " patchtest
2026-07-24 9:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] packagegroup-cross-canadian: gate gdb " Trevor Woerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76897f53eff588bb67e0e5f0b04dac7be6fa0ac2.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=twoerner@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.