From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mousuanming <mousuanming@huawei.com>,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: route: Fix vrf dst_entry ref count false increasing
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 20:56:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7702f04c-648d-eed1-d6eb-20132012d29f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d20b12f2-129a-7055-6dec-075523458b21@huawei.com>
On 5/4/19 8:11 PM, linmiaohe wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/5/4 22:59, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 5/4/19 7:13 AM, linmiaohe wrote:
>>> From: Suanming.Mou <mousuanming@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> When config ip in default vrf same as the ip in specified
>>> vrf, fib_lookup will return the route from table local
>>> even if the in device is an enslaved l3mdev. Then the
>>
>> you need to move the local rule with a preference of 0 after the l3mdev
>> rule.
>>
>>
>
> Move the local rule after l3mdev rule can get rid of this problem. And
> even if this happend, we can delete the same ip address in default vrf
> to fix it.
> But I think maybe it's still a problem because other rule with default
> vrf out device holds the specified vrf device. It looks unreasonable.
>
> Many Thanks.
>
VRF is implemented using policy routing. If you do not move the local
rule below the l3mdev rule, you are doing a lookup in the local table
first, then vrf table, then main table. Doing the local table first can
result in false hits - like the case of duplicate IP addresses in
default VRF and a VRF. In short, it is just wrong.
Looking at the VRF documentation in the kernel tree I do see such a
comment is missing, but I do mention in all of the VRF tutorials such as
this one (see slide 79):
http://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/fe/vrf-tutorial-oss.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-05 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-04 13:13 [PATCH v2] net: route: Fix vrf dst_entry ref count false increasing linmiaohe
2019-05-04 14:59 ` David Ahern
2019-05-05 2:11 ` linmiaohe
2019-05-05 2:56 ` David Ahern [this message]
2019-05-05 3:28 ` linmiaohe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7702f04c-648d-eed1-d6eb-20132012d29f@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingfangsen@huawei.com \
--cc=mousuanming@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.