All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
	seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, scgl@linux.ibm.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: POLARITY_CHANGE qapi event
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:22:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <772f43f2-9dc3-befb-9061-effda2e357eb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <648e62ab-9d66-9a5a-0a03-124c16b85805@redhat.com>



On 1/20/23 12:56, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18/01/2023 18.09, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>
>> On 1/12/23 12:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 05/01/2023 15.53, Pierre Morel wrote:
> ...>>> +#

OK

>>>> +# Emitted when the guest asks to change the polarity.
>>>> +#
>>>> +# @polarity: polarity specified by the guest
>>>
>>> Please elaborate: Where does the value come from (the PTF 
>>> instruction)? Which values are possible?
>>
>> Yes what about:
>>
>> # @polarity: the guest can specify with the PTF instruction a horizontal
>> #            or a vertical polarity.
> 
> Maybe something like: "The guest can tell the host (via the PTF 
> instruction) whether a CPU should have horizontal or vertical polarity." ?

Yes thanks, much better.

> 
>> #         On horizontal polarity the host is expected to provision
>> #            the vCPU equally.
> 
> Maybe: "all vCPUs equally" ?
> Or: "each vCPU equally" ?

yes, thx.


> 
>> #            On vertical polarity the host can provision each vCPU
>> #            differently
>> #            The guest can get information on the provisioning with
>> #            the STSI(15) instruction.
> 
>   Thomas
> 

I make the changes.

Regards,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05 14:53 [PATCH v14 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 01/11] s390x/cpu topology: adding s390 specificities to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-10 11:37   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-16 16:32     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17  7:25       ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-13 16:58   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-16 17:28     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 20:34       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17  9:49         ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17  7:22       ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-01-10 13:00   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11  9:23     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-16 18:24     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-13 18:15   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 13:55     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 16:48       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-19 13:34         ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 03/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-01-10 14:29   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11  9:16     ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-11 17:14     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 16:58       ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 16:56     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 10:26       ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 11:54         ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-19 13:12           ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 13:11   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-16 15:39     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 04/11] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-01-11  8:57   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-17 17:36     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-17 19:58       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-19 13:08         ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 17:52   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17 17:44     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 05/11] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-01-11  9:00   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-17 17:57     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 18:24   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-18  9:54     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-20 14:32     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] target/s390x/cpu topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 10:04   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 10:01     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: change-topology monitor command Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53   ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-11 10:09   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-12  8:00     ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 14:23     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 12:03   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 13:17     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-16 21:09   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-17  7:30     ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-17 13:31       ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-18 10:53         ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 14:09           ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 15:17           ` Kevin Wolf
2023-01-18 15:48             ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 14:06     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: monitor query topology information Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:48   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 15:59     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 12:10   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-12 17:27     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-12 17:30       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 15:58     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-18 16:08       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 16:57         ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: POLARITY_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:52   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-18 17:09     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-20 11:56       ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-20 14:22         ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-01-05 14:53 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:46   ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-19 14:48     ` Pierre Morel
2023-01-12 11:58   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-18 17:10     ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=772f43f2-9dc3-befb-9061-effda2e357eb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.