From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lekshmi Pillai <lekshmicpillai@in.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13 v2] block: Fix block device shutdown related races
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:19:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7734fd93-e4fd-65a7-bf32-08012de83c1e@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170221170958.21845-1-jack@suse.cz>
On 02/21/2017 10:09 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is a second revision of the patch set to fix several different races and
> issues I've found when testing device shutdown and reuse. The first three
> patches are fixes to problems in my previous series fixing BDI lifetime issues.
> Patch 4 fixes issues with reuse of BDI name with scsi devices. With it I cannot
> reproduce the BDI name reuse issues using Omar's stress test using scsi_debug
> so it can be used as a replacement of Dan's patches. Patches 5-11 fix oops that
> is triggered by __blkdev_put() calling inode_detach_wb() too early (the problem
> reported by Thiago). Patches 12 and 13 fix oops due to a bug in gendisk code
> where get_gendisk() can return already freed gendisk structure (again triggered
> by Omar's stress test).
>
> People, please have a look at patches. They are mostly simple however the
> interactions are rather complex so I may have missed something. Also I'm
> happy for any additional testing these patches can get - I've stressed them
> with Omar's script, tested memcg writeback, tested static (not udev managed)
> device inodes.
>
> Jens, I think at least patches 1-3 should go in together with my fixes you
> already have in your tree (or shortly after them). It is up to you whether
> you decide to delay my first fixes or pick these up quickly. Patch 4 is
> (IMHO a cleaner) replacement of Dan's patches so consider whether you want
> to use it instead of those patches.
I have applied 1-3 to my for-linus branch, which will go in after
the initial pull request has been pulled by Linus. Consider fixing up
#4 so it applies, I like it.
I'll review the rest later this week.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 17:09 [PATCH 0/13 v2] block: Fix block device shutdown related races Jan Kara
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] block: Move bdev_unhash_inode() after invalidate_partition() Jan Kara
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] block: Unhash also block device inode for the whole device Jan Kara
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] block: Revalidate i_bdev reference in bd_aquire() Jan Kara
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] block: Move bdi_unregister() to del_gendisk() Jan Kara
2017-02-21 19:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-22 8:51 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-22 17:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] bdi: Mark congested->bdi as internal Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] bdi: Make wb->bdi a proper reference Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:07 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] bdi: Move removal from bdi->wb_list into wb_shutdown() Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] bdi: Shutdown writeback on all cgwbs in cgwb_bdi_destroy() Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:44 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] bdi: Do not wait for cgwbs release in bdi_unregister() Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] bdi: Rename cgwb_bdi_destroy() to cgwb_bdi_unregister() Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] block: Fix oops in locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list() Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] kobject: Export kobject_get_unless_zero() Jan Kara
2017-02-21 19:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] block: Fix oops scsi_disk_get() Jan Kara
2017-02-21 19:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-21 17:19 ` [PATCH 0/13 v2] block: Fix block device shutdown related races Jan Kara
2017-02-21 18:55 ` Dan Williams
2017-02-21 17:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-02-22 10:24 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-01 7:25 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-03-01 7:26 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-03-01 15:11 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-06 20:38 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-03-07 13:57 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-07 16:28 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-03-08 13:21 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-28 16:54 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-01 15:37 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-01 16:26 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7734fd93-e4fd-65a7-bf32-08012de83c1e@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lekshmicpillai@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.