Re: [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] benchmarks/gem_wsim: explicit VM create/assign + LR mode

["Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>]

On 7/17/2026 10:03 AM, Bernatowicz, Marcin wrote:
>
> On 7/15/2026 3:36 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 14/07/2026 16:12, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
>>> This series extends gem_wsim VM management for Xe.
>>>
>>> Patch 1 adds explicit VM create/assign steps in workload descriptors:
>>> V.N to create VM N and v.N.M to bind context M to VM N.
>>>
>>> Patch 2 adds c.N to enable compute/LR mode on selected VMs.
>>> README is updated with syntax and VM usage examples.
>>>
>>> Marcin Bernatowicz (2):
>>>    benchmarks/gem_wsim: add explicit VM create/assign steps
>>>    benchmarks/gem_wsim: add compute/LR mode support for Xe VMs
>>
>> I see these two patches have my Suggested-by but to be honest I do 
>> not remember any of it! :)
>
> That's a very old thread on the first patches adjusting the tool to 
> Xe: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/431b9135-1c7c-cbf7-cc3a-f8d52ff1f015@linux.intel.com/ 
> ;)
>
>>
>> Can I use the opportunity to ask how is the status of the tool on xe? 
>> Do working set and working set dependencies work for example?
> It's used for basic/simple workloads on VMs (Virtual Machines) with 
> passed-through SR-IOV VF devices in regular runs (we use the expected 
> duration of repeated workloads).
>
> Lately, it helped me investigate an RCS/CCS dependency issue: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260708100616.1050537-1-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com/
>
> So, I find it very useful for quick scheduling dependency checks 
> without having to craft or adjust IGT tests.
>
> I haven't looked at working set / working set dependencies on Xe yet :/

I'm planning to send a follow-up series for working sets on Xe soon.


>
> Regards,
>
> marcin
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>>>   benchmarks/gem_wsim.c  | 310 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>   benchmarks/wsim/README |  32 +++++
>>>   2 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>
>>