From: David Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH diagnostic] Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- RCU problem
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <777191.9258.qm@web82105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
> And attached is the kernel module I used to test the patch, for whatever
> that might be worth.
Thank you for that, too. I have some questions and a comment:
1. This module can only be loaded from a working system, right? You
mean that _you_ tested the kernel code on _your_ system to see if it
was working correctly, and did not mean that I should use this with
the problematic kernels on my system? I could easily run this with
something like 'modprobe stall' on my working machine, or on the
problem machine if I boot with the "hpet=disabled" parameter, but
doing so would not help us find the problem, right?
2. Coincidentally, I had started reading Understanding the Linux Kernel
(first edition, 2000) about a week before I got socked with the kernel
freeze issue. I was reading it at work -- I work as a tutor, and there
are sometimes slow times without students to help -- but haven't had a
chance to do so in the best 10 days while I've been struggling with my
own kernel problem. It is also quite out-of-date -- published in 2000,
and discussing the 2.2 kernel line. I know that there have been a
couple of new editions since then, but I just happened to have this first
edition on my shelf... so I took it into work for a little light reading.
Anyway, I have a lot on my personal TODO list for the fall, but maybe
early next year I will have a chance to play with the kernel for fun.
When I do so, I will have your new, experimental module to look at...
among tons of other things.
Thanks,
Dave W.
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-11 16:22 David Witbrodt [this message]
2008-08-11 16:29 ` [PATCH diagnostic] Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- RCU problem Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-11 18:22 David Witbrodt
2008-08-11 19:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-11 18:13 David Witbrodt
2008-08-11 16:04 David Witbrodt
2008-08-11 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-09 22:35 David Witbrodt
2008-08-10 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-11 1:35 ` [PATCH diagnostic] " Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-11 1:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-11 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 13:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=777191.9258.qm@web82105.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=dawitbro@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.