All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Cc: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 bpf-next 4/7] bpf: udp: Use bpf_udp_iter_batch_item for bpf_udp_iter_state batch items
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 14:22:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77957459-cd64-4d7e-a503-829a1cf892c9@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250502161528.264630-5-jordan@jrife.io>

On 5/2/25 9:15 AM, Jordan Rife wrote:
> @@ -3596,8 +3600,8 @@ static void bpf_iter_udp_put_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter)
>   {
>   	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
>   
> -	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
> -		sock_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
> +	while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)

I fixed this to "while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)". Not that matters since the next 
patch 5 fixed itself but it is better to keep this patch clean.

> +		sock_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++].sk);
>   }


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-02 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-02 16:15 [PATCH v7 bpf-next 0/7] bpf: udp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 1/7] bpf: udp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 21:31   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 2/7] bpf: udp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 3/7] bpf: udp: Get rid of st_bucket_done Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 4/7] bpf: udp: Use bpf_udp_iter_batch_item for bpf_udp_iter_state batch items Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 21:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-05-02 21:31     ` Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 5/7] bpf: udp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 21:29   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: Return socket cookies from sock_iter_batch progs Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in UDP socket iterators Jordan Rife
2025-05-02 21:20 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next 0/7] bpf: udp: Exactly-once socket iteration patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77957459-cd64-4d7e-a503-829a1cf892c9@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jordan@jrife.io \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.