All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: Check for enabled drivers before testing them
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:19:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77f00bba-ce4b-ec6e-e48c-89ea797f3cd3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b35ee5a6-e3b1-d134-0a28-bfd45f5c8de4@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1666 bytes --]

On 8/20/19 8:48 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 20.08.19 18:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...]
>> Well, we disable blkverify in our downstream RHEL version of QEMU - so
>> it would be great if the iotests could at least adapt to that missing
>> driver.
> 
> I would like to say that RHEL is not a gold standard

Well, let's put it this way: The less changes we have to carry along
downstream (and thus review each time we rebase the downstream tree),
the more time we have to work on upstream.

> It feels a bit weird to me to say “blkverify is not essential, because
> RHEL disables it, but null-co is” – even though there is no reason why
> anyone would need null-co except for testing either.

Ok, fine for me, too, if we also declare "null-co" as optional for the
iotests - let's make sure that the tests in the "auto" group also work
without them.

>>> Of course, that no longer works as an argument now that we
>>> unconditionally run some iotests in make check.
>>>
>>> But still, the question is how strict you want to be.  If blkdebug
>>> cannot be assumed to be present, what about null-co?  What about raw?
>>
>> I tried to disable everything beside qcow2 - but that causes so many
>> things to fail that it hardly makes sense to try to get that working.
> 
> Hm, really?  I just whitelisted qcow2 and file and running the auto
> group worked rather well (except for the failing tests you address here,
> and the two others I mentioned).

IIRC I tried to run all qcow2 tests when I disabled null-co and saw lots
of failures ... but anyway, let's just focus on the "auto" tests right
now, that should be doable.

 Thomas


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19  7:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: Check for enabled drivers before testing them Thomas Huth
2019-08-19  8:22 ` no-reply
2019-08-20 15:01 ` Max Reitz
2019-08-20 16:01   ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-20 18:48     ` Max Reitz
2019-08-20 19:19       ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-08-20 19:23         ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77f00bba-ce4b-ec6e-e48c-89ea797f3cd3@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.