From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554BCC4167B for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BDE207B8 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729532AbgLCUQh (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:16:37 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:49710 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728032AbgLCUQg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:16:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1607026510; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gK+7PbidYO3ZIXUKWgA3YA1HTz0ROqT+BtZSIAPfma8=; b=IRI+687Vm5n/0dd4471zzjqQUup0IV1pZBc8zYkrmp13cyEL3wHq2IuZO7M1mH7hA1GpAn R1rWGJ+8OKsnowL33+Qx2g03/fp+9Ict5k7SVI9zj30dXkky5Z2aqa+36bkfiUCs8zMZFy 6tQPKzUVM3uXvosujantb1xEykiIQAw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-215-mwhsd2ZgNwi6tNvVGA5blg-1; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:15:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: mwhsd2ZgNwi6tNvVGA5blg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AD0BBEE2; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD15D5D6AC; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs_quota: make manpage non-male-specific To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: xfs References: <44dcd8f3-0585-e463-499f-44256d8bad8d@redhat.com> <9fde98da-d221-87d0-a401-2c82cf1df35f@redhat.com> <20201203201032.GL106272@magnolia> From: Eric Sandeen Message-ID: <77fc2a55-c129-56f9-ebd1-dc75cf4478a5@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:15:06 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201203201032.GL106272@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On 12/3/20 2:10 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:01:24PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Users are not exclusively male, so fix that implication. > > Why not fix configure.ac too? Surely ./configure users are not also > exclusively male? ;) > > "If the user choses a different prefix assume he just wants..." hm ok, I only searched man pages. xfsprogs: don't be male-specific? :) -Eric