All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
Cc: sdf@google.com, edumazet@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:20:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79062e12-6492-362e-c5e3-b08931da0818@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418153148.2231644-8-aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>

On 4/18/23 8:31 AM, Aditi Ghag wrote:
> The test cases for destroying sockets mirror the intended usages of the
> bpf_sock_destroy kfunc using iterators.
> 
> The destroy helpers set `ECONNABORTED` error code that we can validate in
> the test code with client sockets. But UDP sockets have an overriding error
> code from the disconnect called during abort, so the error code the
> validation is only done for TCP sockets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c   | 217 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c   | 147 ++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 364 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..51f2454b7b4b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
> +
> +#include "sock_destroy_prog.skel.h"
> +#include "network_helpers.h"
> +
> +#define TEST_NS "sock_destroy_netns"
> +
> +static void start_iter_sockets(struct bpf_program *prog)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_link *link;
> +	char buf[50] = {};
> +	int iter_fd, len;
> +
> +	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_iter"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "create_iter"))
> +		goto free_link;
> +
> +	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
> +		;
> +	ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
> +
> +	close(iter_fd);
> +
> +free_link:
> +	bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_tcp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;

Together with the multiple goto labels, all the ' = -1' init looks weird. May as 
well: keep this ' = -1' init, always test for -1 before close() and remove the 
need to have mulpite goto label in each test_*() function.

The 'n = 0' init is not needed for sure.

> +
> +	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
> +		goto cleanup_serv;
> +
> +	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto cleanup_serv;
> +
> +	serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "serv accept"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "client send"))

nit. Could be more strict. ASSERT_EQ(n, 1, ...)?

> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys connected client sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_client);
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNABORTED, "error code on destroyed socket");
> +
> +

Patchwork 
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230418153148.2231644-8-aditi.ghag@isovalent.com/) 
reports:

CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#90: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c:62:
+
+

CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#130: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c:102:
+
+

CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#137: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c:109:
+
+

> +cleanup:
> +	close(clien);
> +cleanup_serv:
> +	close(serv);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_tcp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0, err;
> +	__u16 serv_port = 0;

serv_port init is also not needed.

> +
> +	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
> +		goto cleanup_serv;
> +	err = get_socket_local_port(AF_INET6, serv, &serv_port);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "get_local_port"))
> +		goto cleanup;

Like here, it is obvious that it should be 'goto cleanup_serv;'
Test -1 before close() and avoid this multiple goto label confusion.

> +	skel->bss->serv_port = serv_port;
> +
> +	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto cleanup_serv;
> +
> +	serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "serv accept"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "client send"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_server);
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNRESET, "error code on destroyed socket");
> +
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	close(clien);
> +cleanup_serv:
> +	close(serv);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void test_udp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;
> +
> +	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
> +		goto cleanup_serv;
> +
> +	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
> +		goto cleanup_serv;
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(n, 0, "client send"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_udp6_client);
> +
> +	n = send(clien, "t", 1, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client_send on destroyed socket"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	/* UDP sockets have an overriding error code after they are disconnected,
> +	 * so we don't check for ECONNABORTED error code.
> +	 */
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	close(clien);
> +cleanup_serv:
> +	close(serv);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_udp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
> +{
> +	int *listen_fds = NULL, n, i, err;
> +	unsigned int num_listens = 5;
> +	char buf[1];
> +	__u16 serv_port;
> +
> +	/* Start reuseport servers. */
> +	listen_fds = start_reuseport_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM,
> +					    "::1", 0, 0, num_listens);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(listen_fds, "start_reuseport_server"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	err = get_socket_local_port(AF_INET6, listen_fds[0], &serv_port);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "get_local_port"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	skel->bss->serv_port = ntohs(serv_port);

This is different from test_tcp_server() which has serv_port in network order. 
Either order is fine but be consistent across tests.

> +
> +	/* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
> +	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_udp6_server);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_listens; ++i) {
> +		n = read(listen_fds[i], buf, sizeof(buf));
> +		if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, -1, "read") ||
> +		    !ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNABORTED, "error code on destroyed socket"))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	ASSERT_EQ(i, num_listens, "server socket");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	free_fds(listen_fds, num_listens);
> +}
> +
> +void test_sock_destroy(void)
> +{
> +	struct sock_destroy_prog *skel;
> +	struct nstoken *nstoken = NULL;

This init looks unnecessary.

> +	int cgroup_fd = 0;

Looks wrong to init a fd to 0. I don't think an init is needed either.

> +
> +	skel = sock_destroy_prog__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/sock_destroy");
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "join_cgroup"))
> +		goto close_cgroup_fd;
> +
> +	skel->links.sock_connect = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(
> +		skel->progs.sock_connect, cgroup_fd);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.sock_connect, "prog_attach"))
> +		goto close_cgroup_fd;
> +
> +	SYS(fail, "ip netns add %s", TEST_NS);
> +	SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev lo up", TEST_NS);
> +
> +	nstoken = open_netns(TEST_NS);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "open_netns"))
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_client"))
> +		test_tcp_client(skel);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_server"))
> +		test_tcp_server(skel);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("udp_client"))
> +		test_udp_client(skel);
> +	if (test__start_subtest("udp_server"))
> +		test_udp_server(skel);
> +
> +
> +fail:
> +	if (nstoken)
> +		close_netns(nstoken);
> +	SYS_NOFAIL("ip netns del " TEST_NS " &> /dev/null");
> +close_cgroup_fd:
> +	close(cgroup_fd);
> +	sock_destroy_prog__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1f265e0d9dea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
> +
> +#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
> +
> +#define AF_INET6 10

Not needed. This has already been defined in bpf_tracing_net.h.

> +
> +__u16 serv_port = 0;
> +
> +int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sk) __ksym;
> +
> +struct {
> +	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
> +	__uint(max_entries, 1);
> +	__type(key, __u32);
> +	__type(value, __u64);
> +} tcp_conn_sockets SEC(".maps");
> +
> +struct {
> +	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
> +	__uint(max_entries, 1);
> +	__type(key, __u32);
> +	__type(value, __u64);
> +} udp_conn_sockets SEC(".maps");
> +
> +SEC("cgroup/connect6")
> +int sock_connect(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> +{
> +	int key = 0;
> +	__u64 sock_cookie = 0;
> +	__u32 keyc = 0;
> +
> +	if (ctx->family != AF_INET6 || ctx->user_family != AF_INET6)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	sock_cookie = bpf_get_socket_cookie(ctx);
> +	if (ctx->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
> +		bpf_map_update_elem(&tcp_conn_sockets, &key, &sock_cookie, 0);
> +	else if (ctx->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP)
> +		bpf_map_update_elem(&udp_conn_sockets, &keyc, &sock_cookie, 0);
> +	else
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("iter/tcp")
> +int iter_tcp6_client(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct sock_common *sk_common = ctx->sk_common;
> +	__u64 sock_cookie = 0;
> +	__u64 *val;
> +	int key = 0;
> +
> +	if (!sk_common)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (sk_common->skc_family != AF_INET6)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	sock_cookie  = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk_common);
> +	val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&tcp_conn_sockets, &key);
> +	if (!val)
> +		return 0;
> +	/* Destroy connected client sockets. */
> +	if (sock_cookie == *val)
> +		bpf_sock_destroy(sk_common);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("iter/tcp")
> +int iter_tcp6_server(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct sock_common *sk_common = ctx->sk_common;
> +	struct tcp6_sock *tcp_sk;
> +	const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk;
> +	const struct inet_sock *inet;
> +	__u16 srcp;
> +
> +	if (!sk_common)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (sk_common->skc_family != AF_INET6)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	tcp_sk = bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock(sk_common);
> +	if (!tcp_sk)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	icsk = &tcp_sk->tcp.inet_conn;
> +	inet = &icsk->icsk_inet;
> +	srcp = inet->inet_sport;
> +
> +	/* Destroy server sockets. */
> +	if (srcp == serv_port)
> +		bpf_sock_destroy(sk_common);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +SEC("iter/udp")
> +int iter_udp6_client(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct udp_sock *udp_sk = ctx->udp_sk;
> +	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *) udp_sk;
> +	__u64 sock_cookie = 0, *val;
> +	int key = 0;
> +
> +	if (!sk)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	sock_cookie  = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk);
> +	val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&udp_conn_sockets, &key);
> +	if (!val)
> +		return 0;
> +	/* Destroy connected client sockets. */
> +	if (sock_cookie == *val)
> +		bpf_sock_destroy((struct sock_common *)sk);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("iter/udp")
> +int iter_udp6_server(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct udp_sock *udp_sk = ctx->udp_sk;
> +	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *) udp_sk;
> +	__u16 srcp;
> +	struct inet_sock *inet;
> +
> +	if (!sk)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	inet = &udp_sk->inet;
> +	srcp = bpf_ntohs(inet->inet_sport);

Try sk->sk_num if host order is preferred.

> +	if (srcp == serv_port)
> +		bpf_sock_destroy((struct sock_common *)sk);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-24 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18 15:31 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add socket destroy capability Aditi Ghag
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] bpf: tcp: Avoid taking fast sock lock in iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-04-20  8:55   ` Paolo Abeni
2023-05-03 20:25     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-04-25  5:45   ` Yonghong Song
2023-05-03 20:26     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] udp: seq_file: Remove bpf_seq_afinfo from udp_iter_state Aditi Ghag
2023-04-24  0:18   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-01 22:39     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] udp: seq_file: Helper function to match socket attributes Aditi Ghag
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] bpf: udp: Implement batching for sockets iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-04-20 14:07   ` Paolo Abeni
2023-04-24  5:46   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc Aditi Ghag
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add helper to get port using getsockname Aditi Ghag
2023-04-18 18:45   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-24 17:58     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-18 15:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy Aditi Ghag
2023-04-24 19:20   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-04-24 22:15 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add socket destroy capability Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-01 23:32   ` Aditi Ghag
2023-05-01 23:37     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-05-02 23:24       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-02 22:52     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-05-02 23:40       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-04 17:32         ` Aditi Ghag

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79062e12-6492-362e-c5e3-b08931da0818@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.