Re: [PATCH] tools: Add install/uninstall targets to tests/x86_emulator

[Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>]

On 16/05/2024 12:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> Bring test_x86_emulator in line with other tests by adding
>> install/uninstall rules.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile | 11 +++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
>> index 834b2112e7fe..30edf7e0185d 100644
>> --- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/Makefile
>> @@ -269,8 +269,15 @@ clean:
>>  .PHONY: distclean
>>  distclean: clean
>>  
>> -.PHONY: install uninstall
>> -install uninstall:
>> +.PHONY: install
>> +install: all
>> +	$(INSTALL_DIR) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBEXEC_BIN)
>> +	$(if $(TARGET-y),$(INSTALL_PROG) $(TARGET-y) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBEXEC_BIN))
>> +
>> +.PHONY: uninstall
>> +uninstall:
>> +	$(RM) -- $(addprefix $(DESTDIR)$(LIBEXEC_BIN)/,$(TARGET-y))
>> +
> 
> FWIW, should you check that HOSTCC == CC before installing?  Otherwise
> I'm unsure of the result in cross-compiled builds, as the x86_emulator
> is built with HOSTCC, not CC.
> 
> Thanks, Roger.

Right...

More generally, should we do s/CC/HOSTCC/ on all compiler checks? I see
no particular reason to do them on $(CC) rather than the actual compiler
used during build.

Cheers,
Alejandro