From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Volker Rümelin" <vr_qemu@t-online.de>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <huth@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] audio: replace open-coded buffer arithmetic
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 18:40:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7976963.x2vcT3psHa@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220122125745.5037-1-vr_qemu@t-online.de>
On Samstag, 22. Januar 2022 13:57:31 CET Volker Rümelin wrote:
> Replace open-coded buffer arithmetic with the new function
> audio_ring_posb(). That's the position in backward direction
> of a given point at a given distance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Volker Rümelin <vr_qemu@t-online.de>
> ---
First of all, getting rid of all those redundant, open coded ringbuffer
traversal code places highly makes sense!
> audio/audio.c | 25 +++++++------------------
> audio/audio_int.h | 6 ++++++
> audio/coreaudio.c | 10 ++++------
> audio/sdlaudio.c | 11 +++++------
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/audio/audio.c b/audio/audio.c
> index dc28685d22..e7a139e289 100644
> --- a/audio/audio.c
> +++ b/audio/audio.c
> @@ -574,19 +574,13 @@ static size_t audio_pcm_sw_get_rpos_in(SWVoiceIn *sw)
> {
> HWVoiceIn *hw = sw->hw;
> ssize_t live = hw->total_samples_captured - sw->total_hw_samples_acquired;
> - ssize_t rpos;
>
> if (audio_bug(__func__, live < 0 || live > hw->conv_buf->size)) {
> dolog("live=%zu hw->conv_buf->size=%zu\n", live, hw->conv_buf->size);
> return 0;
> }
>
> - rpos = hw->conv_buf->pos - live;
> - if (rpos >= 0) {
> - return rpos;
> - } else {
> - return hw->conv_buf->size + rpos;
> - }
> + return audio_ring_posb(hw->conv_buf->pos, live, hw->conv_buf->size);
> }
>
> static size_t audio_pcm_sw_read(SWVoiceIn *sw, void *buf, size_t size)
> @@ -1394,12 +1388,10 @@ void audio_generic_run_buffer_in(HWVoiceIn *hw)
>
> void *audio_generic_get_buffer_in(HWVoiceIn *hw, size_t *size)
> {
> - ssize_t start = (ssize_t)hw->pos_emul - hw->pending_emul;
> + size_t start;
>
> - if (start < 0) {
> - start += hw->size_emul;
> - }
> - assert(start >= 0 && start < hw->size_emul);
> + start = audio_ring_posb(hw->pos_emul, hw->pending_emul, hw->size_emul);
> + assert(start < hw->size_emul);
>
> *size = MIN(*size, hw->pending_emul);
> *size = MIN(*size, hw->size_emul - start);
> @@ -1415,13 +1407,10 @@ void audio_generic_put_buffer_in(HWVoiceIn *hw, void
> *buf, size_t size) void audio_generic_run_buffer_out(HWVoiceOut *hw)
> {
> while (hw->pending_emul) {
> - size_t write_len, written;
> - ssize_t start = ((ssize_t) hw->pos_emul) - hw->pending_emul;
> + size_t write_len, written, start;
>
> - if (start < 0) {
> - start += hw->size_emul;
> - }
> - assert(start >= 0 && start < hw->size_emul);
> + start = audio_ring_posb(hw->pos_emul, hw->pending_emul, hw->size_emul);
> + assert(start < hw->size_emul);
>
> write_len = MIN(hw->pending_emul, hw->size_emul - start);
Just refactoring so far, which looks good so far.
> diff --git a/audio/audio_int.h b/audio/audio_int.h
> index 428a091d05..2fb459f34e 100644
> --- a/audio/audio_int.h
> +++ b/audio/audio_int.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,12 @@ static inline size_t audio_ring_dist(size_t dst, size_t src, size_t len)
> return (dst >= src) ? (dst - src) : (len - src + dst);
> }
You haven't touched this function, but while I am looking at it, all function
arguments are unsigned. So probably modulo operator might be used to get rid
of a branch here.
>
> +/* return new position in backward direction at given distance */
> +static inline size_t audio_ring_posb(size_t pos, size_t dist, size_t len)
> +{
> + return pos >= dist ? pos - dist : len - dist + pos;
> +}
> +
Which is the exact same code as the already existing audio_ring_dist()
function above, and I see that you actually already used this in v1 before:
#define audio_ring_posb(pos, dist, len) audio_ring_dist(pos, dist, len)
I would definitely not copy-paste the body. Thomas just suggested in v1 to add
a comment, not to duplicate the actual math code:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220106111718.0ec25383@tuxfamily.org/
Also for consistency, I would have called the function audio_ring_rpos()
and would have commented each argument.
/**
* Returns new position in ringbuffer in backward direction at given distance.
* @pos: current position in ringbuffer
* @dist: distance in ringbuffer to walk in reverse direction
* @len: size of ringbuffer
*/
static inline size_t audio_ring_rpos(pos, dist, len) {
return audio_ring_dist(pos, dist, len);
}
At least IMO a bit more comments on math code barely hurts.
> #define dolog(fmt, ...) AUD_log(AUDIO_CAP, fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__)
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> diff --git a/audio/coreaudio.c b/audio/coreaudio.c
> index d8a21d3e50..1fdd1d4b14 100644
> --- a/audio/coreaudio.c
> +++ b/audio/coreaudio.c
> @@ -333,12 +333,10 @@ static OSStatus audioDeviceIOProc(
>
> len = frameCount * hw->info.bytes_per_frame;
> while (len) {
> - size_t write_len;
> - ssize_t start = ((ssize_t) hw->pos_emul) - hw->pending_emul;
> - if (start < 0) {
> - start += hw->size_emul;
> - }
> - assert(start >= 0 && start < hw->size_emul);
> + size_t write_len, start;
> +
> + start = audio_ring_posb(hw->pos_emul, hw->pending_emul, hw->size_emul);
> + assert(start < hw->size_emul);
>
> write_len = MIN(MIN(hw->pending_emul, len),
> hw->size_emul - start);
> diff --git a/audio/sdlaudio.c b/audio/sdlaudio.c
> index c68c62a3e4..d6f3aa1a9a 100644
> --- a/audio/sdlaudio.c
> +++ b/audio/sdlaudio.c
> @@ -224,12 +224,11 @@ static void sdl_callback_out(void *opaque, Uint8 *buf,
> int len) /* dolog("callback_out: len=%d avail=%zu\n", len,
> hw->pending_emul); */
>
> while (hw->pending_emul && len) {
> - size_t write_len;
> - ssize_t start = (ssize_t)hw->pos_emul - hw->pending_emul;
> - if (start < 0) {
> - start += hw->size_emul;
> - }
> - assert(start >= 0 && start < hw->size_emul);
> + size_t write_len, start;
> +
> + start = audio_ring_posb(hw->pos_emul, hw->pending_emul,
> + hw->size_emul);
> + assert(start < hw->size_emul);
>
> write_len = MIN(MIN(hw->pending_emul, len),
> hw->size_emul - start);
This rest looks fine to me.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-23 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-22 12:52 [PATCH v2 00/15] reduce audio playback latency Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] audio: replace open-coded buffer arithmetic Volker Rümelin
2022-01-23 17:40 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2022-01-25 18:57 ` Volker Rümelin
2022-01-26 8:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-03-01 18:59 ` Volker Rümelin
2022-01-26 12:01 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] audio: move function audio_pcm_hw_clip_out() Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] audio: add function audio_pcm_hw_conv_in() Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] audio: inline function audio_pcm_sw_get_rpos_in() Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] paaudio: increase default latency to 46ms Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] jackaudio: use more jack audio buffers Volker Rümelin
2022-01-23 17:51 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] audio: copy playback stream in sequential order Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] audio: add pcm_ops function table for capture backend Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] Revert "audio: fix wavcapture segfault" Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] audio: restore mixing-engine playback buffer size Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] paaudio: reduce effective " Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] dsoundaudio: " Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] ossaudio: " Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] paaudio: fix samples vs. frames mix-up Volker Rümelin
2022-01-22 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] sdlaudio: " Volker Rümelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7976963.x2vcT3psHa@silver \
--to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=huth@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vr_qemu@t-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.