All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] swapping: replace mem_free by mem_available
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 06:04:50 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <799714053.10227172.1470045890634.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470040135-26072-1-git-send-email-liwang@redhat.com>





----- Original Message -----
> From: "Li Wang" <liwang@redhat.com>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Cc: jstancek@redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, 1 August, 2016 10:28:55 AM
> Subject: [PATCH v2] swapping: replace mem_free by mem_available
> 
> On some ppc64 systems, there free memory are larger than available memory,
> but
> total swap size is very small. Then this swapping01 easily get failures like:
> 
> swapping01    0  TINFO  :  free physical memory: 14651 MB
> swapping01    0  TINFO  :  try to allocate: 19046 MB
> swapping01    1  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:134: malloc: errno=ENOMEM(12): Cannot
> allocate memory
> swapping01    2  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:134: Remaining cases broken
> swapping01    1  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:151: child was not stopped.
> swapping01    2  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:151: Remaining cases broken
> 
>  # free -m
>                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache
>                available
>  Mem:          15316         238       14651           0         427
>  14478
>  Swap:          4607         202        4405
> 
> That's because 14478(available_mem) + 4405(swap_free) < 19046(expected:
> 14651(free_mem) * 1.3),
> so we get malloc ENOMEM errors.
> 
> In this patch:
>   * replace the free memory by available
>   * compare total swap with mem_over_max
>   * take new method to monitor swap usage
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c | 56
>  ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> index b530ee2..20bd254 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,9 @@ static void init_meminfo(void);
>  static void do_alloc(void);
>  static void check_swapping(void);
>  
> -static long mem_free_init;
> +static long mem_available_init;
>  static long swap_free_init;
> +static long swap_total;
>  static long mem_over;
>  static long mem_over_max;
>  static pid_t pid;
> @@ -107,20 +108,21 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>  static void init_meminfo(void)
>  {
> +	swap_total = read_meminfo("SwapTotal:");
>  	swap_free_init = read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
> -	mem_free_init = read_meminfo("MemFree:");
> -	mem_over = mem_free_init * COE_SLIGHT_OVER;
> -	mem_over_max = mem_free_init * COE_DELTA;
> -
> -	/* at least 10MB free physical memory needed */
> -	if (mem_free_init < 10240) {
> -		sleep(5);
> -		if (mem_free_init < 10240)
> +	if (FILE_LINES_SCANF(cleanup, "/proc/meminfo", "MemAvailable: %ld",
> +				&mem_available_init))
> +		mem_available_init = read_meminfo("MemFree:") + read_meminfo("Cached:");
> +	mem_over = mem_available_init * COE_SLIGHT_OVER;
> +	mem_over_max = mem_available_init * COE_DELTA;
> +
> +	/* at least 10MB available physical memory needed */
> +	if (mem_available_init < 10240)
>  			tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup,
> -				 "Not enough free memory to test.");
> -	}
> -	if (swap_free_init < mem_over)
> -		tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "Not enough swap space to test.");
> +				 "Not enough avalable memory to test.");
> +
> +	if (swap_total < mem_over_max)
> +		tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "swap size is not fit to test");

Shouldn't this be "swap_free_init > mem_over_max"? Some of the swap
can be used at the start of test and condition below compares the
difference from initial value.

>  }
>  
>  static void do_alloc(void)
> @@ -128,8 +130,8 @@ static void do_alloc(void)
>  	long mem_count;
>  	void *s;
>  
> -	tst_resm(TINFO, "free physical memory: %ld MB", mem_free_init / 1024);
> -	mem_count = mem_free_init + mem_over;
> +	tst_resm(TINFO, "available physical memory: %ld MB", mem_available_init /
> 1024);
> +	mem_count = mem_available_init + mem_over;
>  	tst_resm(TINFO, "try to allocate: %ld MB", mem_count / 1024);
>  	s = malloc(mem_count * 1024);
>  	if (s == NULL)
> @@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ static void do_alloc(void)
>  static void check_swapping(void)
>  {
>  	int status, i;
> -	long swapped;
> +	long swap_free_now, swapped;
>  
>  	/* wait child stop */
>  	if (waitpid(pid, &status, WUNTRACED) == -1)
> @@ -153,15 +155,23 @@ static void check_swapping(void)
>  		tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "child was not stopped.");
>  
>  	/* Still occupying memory, loop for a while */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> -		swapped = swap_free_init - read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
> -		if (swapped > mem_over_max) {
> -			kill(pid, SIGCONT);
> -			tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "heavy swapping detected: "
> -				 "%ld MB swapped.", swapped / 1024);
> -		}
> +	i = 0;
> +	while (i < 10) {
> +		swap_free_now = read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
>  		sleep(1);
> +		if (abs(swap_free_now - read_meminfo("SwapFree:")) < 512)
> +			break;
> +
> +		i++;
>  	}
> +

I'd probably add here:
  swap_free_now = read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
again, since current value can be stale.

Regards,
Jan

> +	swapped = swap_free_init - swap_free_now;
> +	if (swapped > mem_over_max) {
> +		kill(pid, SIGCONT);
> +		tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "heavy swapping detected: "
> +				"%ld MB swapped.", swapped / 1024);
> +	}
> +
>  	tst_resm(TPASS, "no heavy swapping detected, %ld MB swapped.",
>  		 swapped / 1024);
>  	kill(pid, SIGCONT);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-01 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01  8:28 [LTP] [PATCH v2] swapping: replace mem_free by mem_available Li Wang
2016-08-01 10:04 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-08-01 10:37   ` Li Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=799714053.10227172.1470045890634.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.