From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EHpam-0005fq-Jt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:23:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EHpad-0005bF-Je
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:23:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHpad-0005U4-Dl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:23:47 -0400
Received: from [64.233.162.206] (helo=zproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EHpUN-0001z1-6l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:17:19 -0400
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so1566106nzh
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <79bf98480509201417489c0dbe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:17:18 -0700
From: Mike Swanson <mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] what is the major,
	minor numbers of kqemu under linux ?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0509201034390.7530@filer.marasystems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b465f34b05091922014e5ca56a@mail.gmail.com>
	<79bf984805092000037248cc03@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0509201034390.7530@filer.marasystems.com>
Reply-To: mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I don't know... I've tried to create the node before, but it only
seems to work when kqemu is not loaded. Perhaps it's a bug, but it's
the way it works, for me at least.

On 9/20/05, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com> wrote:
> Why? The existence of device nodes is only relevant to user-space, not
> kernel modules (only once the device node exists can user-space contact
> the kernel module)
>=20
> Regards
> Henrik
>=20
--=20
Mike