All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@redhat.com>,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: Set deferred probe timeout to 0 if modules are disabled
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:51:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79f79051-8118-4735-67f2-74e8b6e1c010@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116163931.ob7szcnjx65c7gz7@halaney-x13s>

Hello Andrew,

Thanks for your feedback.

On 11/16/22 17:39, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> There is no point to schedule the work queue to timeout the deferred probe
>> if all the initcalls are done and modules are not enabled. The default for
>> this case is already 0 but can be overridden by the deferred_probe_timeout
>> parameter. Let's just disable to avoid queuing a work that is not needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v1)
>>
>>  drivers/base/dd.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> index 040b4060f903..1e8f1afeac98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> @@ -350,8 +350,10 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void)
>>  	flush_work(&deferred_probe_work);
>>  	initcalls_done = true;
>>  
>> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES))
>> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)) {
>> +		driver_deferred_probe_timeout = 0;
>>  		fw_devlink_drivers_done();
>> +	}
>>  
> 
> Potentially a stupid suggestion, but would it make sense to take out
> the ability to actually set that param if !CONFIG_MODULES? Then
> driver_deferred_probe_timeout would be the default value already.
> 

Yes, I think it makes sense. I will do that in the next iteration.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16 11:53 [PATCH v2 0/4] driver core: Decouple device links enforcing and probe deferral timeouts Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] driver core: Make driver_deferred_probe_timeout a static variable Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 12:57   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-17 19:14   ` John Stultz
2022-12-12  8:50     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-12-12  8:59       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-12  9:06         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: Set deferred probe timeout to 0 if modules are disabled Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 16:39   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-16 16:51     ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-11-16 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] driver core: Add fw_devlink.timeout param to stop waiting for devlinks Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 16:09   ` Randy Dunlap
2022-11-16 19:05   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-17 15:19   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-17 18:55     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-17 19:07   ` John Stultz
2022-11-17 19:16     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] driver core: Disable driver deferred probe timeout by default Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 19:15   ` Andrew Halaney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79f79051-8118-4735-67f2-74e8b6e1c010@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=eballetbo@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbrobinson@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=steev@kali.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.