From: "Bailey, Scott" <scott.bailey@eds.com>
To: 'Timo Boettcher' <spida@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: What raid to build on that drives?
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:49:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7FD257BF8564D4119DA800508BDF07AA0FB51D47@usahm012.exmi01.exch.eds.com> (raw)
>> I have 3 * 36GB discs and 5 * 18GB discs on two u160 scsi channels?
>> What possibilities do I have to build a raid on them? I want to be
>> able to survive one failed disc, but get as much space and
>> performance out of the discs as possible.
> How about two RAID5 arrays, one with the 3*36GB=72GB and the other using
> the 5*18GB=72GB. Then throw both of these under a RAID0 which will get
> you 144GB and still be able to survive 1 disk failure.
Here's a twisted thought, which would increase your available space, but
probably at the expense of some amount of performance degradation:
1. Partition your 36GB disks so first partition is the same size as one of
your 18GB disks, and the second partition is the remainder of the disk (also
about 18GB).
2. Create a RAID5 array containing 8*18GB disks (5 18GB disks + 3 18GB
partitions) = approx 126GB usable.
3. Create a RAID5 array containing 3*18GB partitions = approx 36 GB usable.
4. At this point, I would *NOT* recommend building a RAID0 array from (2)
and (3), as you will end up generating a lot of contention on the 36GB disks
by doing so. Either use them as separate devices, or concatenate them (using
LVM perhaps) if you really need all of the space in "one place".
This will get you a total of about 162GB usable while still being able to
survive a single disk failure.
I imagine simultaneous rebuilds of both RAID5 devices would not be a
pleasant experience. :-)
Cheers,
Scott
scott.bailey@eds.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-01 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 21:49 Bailey, Scott [this message]
2003-12-01 22:25 ` What raid to build on that drives? Neil Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-26 19:36 Timo Boettcher
2003-11-26 19:59 ` Dan Egli
2003-11-26 21:08 ` Timo Boettcher
2003-11-26 22:12 ` Neil Brown
2003-11-26 21:44 ` David Rees
2003-11-26 22:13 ` Timo Boettcher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7FD257BF8564D4119DA800508BDF07AA0FB51D47@usahm012.exmi01.exch.eds.com \
--to=scott.bailey@eds.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spida@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.