From: Anantha Kiran <ananth.kandukuri@gmail.com>
To: "alex@pilosoft.com" <alex@pilosoft.com>, linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux based router for Gigabit traffic
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:55:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a436d9b040822112563fb6ea7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408220858160.1897-100000@bawx.pilosoft.com>
No, we are not using NAPI for this. But we wrote a net_hook module
which catches the pkts before allowing it to go upper layers.
CPU utilization is 70+ while dropping.
Can u tell me the configuration of your low-end machine.Like PCI-bus,
and others.
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:59:14 -0400 (EDT), alex@pilosoft.com
<alex@pilosoft.com> wrote:
> > I am doing a project, in which i have to redirect traffic coming from
> > one ethernet card of a machine, to one of three remaining three ethernet
> > cards of same machine based on the src,dest IP and Port values of the
> > pkt. I wrote a net_hook module to do this which i working fine for lower
> > speeds like < 400 Mbps traffic. But project goal is to deal with gigabit
> > traffic. I have used gigabit ethernet cards and Switch. But when the
> > traffic rate is more than 400Mbps it is dropping packets. I did test,
> > by increasing the transmit queue length. But same problem is coming. I
> > have found during the pkt drop there is no memory or CPU is hundred
> > percently utilised. So, what can be the resource that is lacking while
> > dropping of pkts is happend.
> Are you using NAPI?
>
> What is the CPU utilization when packets start being dropped?
>
> I route full GE worth of traffic on a low-end machine without a problem.
>
> -alex
>
>
--
K.AnanthaKiran
D-108/HALL-7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-22 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408220858160.1897-100000@bawx.pilosoft.com>
[not found] ` <4128CA84.7000304@redhat.com>
2004-08-22 18:14 ` Linux based router for Gigabit traffic Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 18:25 ` Anantha Kiran [this message]
2004-08-23 15:39 ` Stephen J. Smoogen
2004-08-22 12:32 Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 12:49 ` Neil Horman
2004-08-23 5:56 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23 7:11 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-23 13:10 ` Adam Lang
2004-08-23 7:58 ` urgrue
2004-08-23 11:17 ` Neil Horman
2004-08-23 11:36 ` urgrue
2004-08-25 7:48 ` Stephen Samuel
2004-08-23 15:31 ` Stephen J. Smoogen
2004-08-22 15:07 ` Matti Aarnio
2004-08-27 18:01 ` neolozer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-22 10:38 Anantha Kiran
2004-08-22 10:56 ` Sascha Retzki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a436d9b040822112563fb6ea7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ananth.kandukuri@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@pilosoft.com \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.