All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm/x86/pat: Do proper PAT bit shift for large mappings
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 20:30:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b6b6430-0237-4512-b99b-9eb815b3dc68@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zk_MGmfYsY9dt2Uo@x1n>

On 5/23/24 16:07, Peter Xu wrote:
> Probably not..  I think I can define a pgprot_to_large() globally, pointing
> that to pgprot_4k_2_large() on x86 and make the fallback to be noop.  And
> if there's a new version I'll guarantee to run over my cross compilers.

I guess that would be functional, but it would be a bit mean to
everybody else.

> Any comments on the idea itself?  Do we have a problem, or maybe I
> overlooked something?

I think it's probably unnecessary to inflict this particular x86-ism on
generic code.  The arch-generic 'prot' should have PAT at its 4k
(_PAGE_BIT_PAT) position and then p*d_mkhuge() can shift it into the
_PAGE_BIT_PAT_LARGE spot.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-24  3:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 22:37 [PATCH RFC 0/2] mm/x86/pat: Fix two possible issues Peter Xu
2024-05-23 22:37 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] mm/x86/pat: Only untrack the pfn range if unmap region Peter Xu
2024-05-23 22:37 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm/x86/pat: Do proper PAT bit shift for large mappings Peter Xu
2024-05-23 22:48   ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-23 23:07     ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24  0:53       ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24  3:30       ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2024-05-24 23:55         ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7b6b6430-0237-4512-b99b-9eb815b3dc68@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.