From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF82EA3C5C for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1278734.1563488 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wB9RP-0000Ag-HB; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:50:23 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1278734.1563488; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:50:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wB9RP-0000AZ-EW; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:50:23 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1278734; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:50:22 +0000 Received: from mx.expurgate.net ([195.190.135.10]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wB9RO-0000AT-ML for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:50:22 +0000 Received: from mx.expurgate.net (helo=localhost) by mx.expurgate.net with esmtp id 1wB9RO-00FKW1-2P for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:50:22 +0200 Received: from [10.42.69.11] (helo=localhost) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate MTA 0.9.1) (envelope-from ) id 69d8d5e7-2eae-0a2a0a5409dd-0a2a450ba59a-26 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:50:21 +0200 Received: from [209.85.221.47] (helo=mail-wr1-f47.google.com) by tlsNG-42698a.mxtls.expurgate.net with ESMTPS (eXpurgate 4.56.0) (envelope-from ) id 69d8d5ed-bca8-0a2a450b0019-d155dd2fccff-3 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:50:21 +0200 Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43cf8d550bdso1859510f8f.0 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.156.60.236] (ip-037-024-206-209.um08.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [37.24.206.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43d63deba9esm6932343f8f.10.2026.04.10.03.50.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:50:21 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Authentication-Results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1775818221; x=1776423021; darn=lists.xenproject.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B+HoP/mMaG5yYZyVjtUnYROQmO400kNler9q5jRv0/g=; b=ZPr5Nd3A0VNO1YjMIx3Dmb0zarIK+rEdOWBfCOn9ChOuLMZBRH7Hv8QJsqfhTyqzsA PgEnumRhJX1hGpst4wvQYJ+qg6wvIGQJhxp6543N2gyRCBpaFRvd0BVe8lJAXLtzAR+a MWSXgnoCLnp2w8L9wfoPkkMWfSBaPi9fp+ENtNGEEVLV2ivDnhwyE3DVc+rHLuCc9/Sj fdlwjTnESF0RTr95AxuH2NNFJcXAVfYkJT+bzkENP+mJ7nNfhAYxTEs7UP7d4aUozN9+ WYl0q7kplekIyf+FaT6zOSQ9XMjgp9EpAHJ7YJxjntgSBY56ovsRcTcGtSUyKM1PY0hC XjTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775818221; x=1776423021; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=B+HoP/mMaG5yYZyVjtUnYROQmO400kNler9q5jRv0/g=; b=UDmx4ndXlw4LnHHlbuabGieFLO69xtU1ZaU6IXjoDreZeyZ0plkUbH28CwK8MGWDo2 P+OVSruv3rBwG2osxLHE0uCK4vO1zMO6hOCgHy6r6L9tkr5zAtEAUmeNF3nsr1uWzlMd wwfJpEesaEw5jjWAmGeP4PNRyPruvPPf6wnEwVl1W3AoV2ovUBP0i0XR/B5hIJbosaU2 FRW+aEjXc9sL5Jb3QOzisy71SCE6mt3HxxyU9BXiGpQ7ohMleIf5Myly2G2JfId/RhH7 5dirFLLBXIaLJjgS29xgJ0TIPYZTkXWNRlhMko3MJaTpvS+fUpffmAuJds/x7sLDHJhO h9XQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUqBB09TBIiS2kw5PkJLryvbpSsdOTppoBtGPKg9c6Zrrn7ZFkgb/7VCFP0SNummt3JrbRzc7T4a68=@lists.xenproject.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLxAe+upk+E4ar8hbmeXd7mRCNep7/OHXNO/9tiMrMzSpusktK V1B+YHbMQrNAs5mF2RPNv1bhYmnyZ5dNJpO86bCaF9uQzLN6KS6xOjnCUpqRCZwPbg== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDies294f6k9WrvsgLhrQnzdwyPE5UaKh1+sn2jl4hYPmjxrL0ztxUX0PFLicPyJ8 4CWrSYNY3KlfsA0tnWCqTqfiCRXbrB7qLgDKPSnhrafuRzgJmrgZ33MlimMd1l6MXA71K2L2yVX 4SI+VTdx9wv6YPI2HurRP58jfrYtnOqdDEfwDeRoQgZb18nFUYyl/M/eacOyURt9YN+PksU4/42 JObhIVJtIxRg318Pk1HFGBvFmhYXIhH8wJCDUJOdNb3gUt8tJd3idtk/Xz/uz8sEbXtyHP17a23 Kal2J3Jn07tT5QrXo3rAq3DSlkgyp0NCq+SHF0AxinzHDmOkQD/ZLaOBYt9l/KtUtjC9g4K8qF5 dEk6JYHYOMvjkZXrRlIh0vOXr0xpLLG8ykmhH2RsgrQZjvx/qhyaxqBbru5NNwE8x1KAv2A4R+n 9y3aF8Tb1afwjnrWFN/Z+QOaIvURRzdfHJgSQVB0wrKMwPyXsIKPGj1ytd7x1qL2T2CilTroWE+ vtm3fduL755nz8= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:64c7:0:b0:43c:fbde:310f with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43d642d35d2mr4098591f8f.36.1775818221438; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 03:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7bdb23f7-fea8-4fbe-bffd-c6f2bf2c373e@suse.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:50:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/27] xen/riscv: introduce guest riscv,isa string To: Oleksii Kurochko Cc: Romain Caritey , Alistair Francis , Connor Davis , Andrew Cooper , Anthony PERARD , Michal Orzel , Julien Grall , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <007c0a0243ac7ff1d1ab3faa4ebcdd6fcd14e485.1773157782.git.oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jan Beulich Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@suse.com; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-purgate-ID: tlsNG-42698a/1775818221-EED4F2A1-620E2A1B/0/0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-size: 1264 On 10.04.2026 12:24, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > On 4/1/26 3:49 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 10.03.2026 18:08, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> +#define MAX_GUEST_ISA_STR_LEN 256 >>> +char guest_isa_str[MAX_GUEST_ISA_STR_LEN]; >> >> __ro_after_init? >> >> Yet then - can this really be a global? Isn't the set of extensions >> available to a guest a per-guest property, i.e. a global could at best >> represent an upper bound on features? > > At least, for now I think it is okay just to use global guest riscv,isa > for all the domains. From my point of view if Xen doesn't support some > extension to be used by guest so then should be responsible to generate > proper riscv,isa. > > It probably make sense to have riscv,isa per guest but then we still > will want to parse this passed riscv,isa and check what Xen supports and > what not, what looks like a double work a little bit. Probably it is the > best one option and if riscv,isa isn't provided then just use that one > generated by Xen. My take is: Have data arrangement be as it wants to be in the end (i.e. here: record what ought to be per guest as per-guest data). All guests using the same value for now is a fair restriction until things have progressed more. Jan