From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:37:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bnye4ue.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616163405.96962-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations can operate in
> compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations. This becomes
> relevant for nested virtualization, where nested KVM guests may need to
> run with a specific processor compatibility level.
>
> Currently, when running a nested KVM guest (L2) inside a Power11 pSeries
> logical partition (L1) booted in Power10 compatibility mode, the guest
> fails to boot while setting 'arch_compat'. This happens because the CPU
> class is derived from the hardware PVR (via mfspr()), which reflects the
> physical processor generation (Power11), rather than the effective
> compatibility mode (Power10).
>
> As a result, userspace may request a Power11 arch_compat for the L2
> guest. However, the L1 partition, running in Power10 compatibility, has
> only negotiated support up to Power10 with the Power Hypervisor (L0).
> When H_GUEST_SET_STATE is invoked with a Power11 Logical PVR, the
> hypervisor rejects the request, leading to a late guest boot failure:
>
> KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
> [..KVM reg dump..]
>
> This situation should be detected earlier and rejected by KVM. Without
> proper validation, if userspace ignores the error, the guest may continue
> to boot in Power11 raw mode on a Power10 compatibility host, which should
> not be allowed.
>
> Introduce a validation mechanism that detects unsupported arch_compat
> values early in the guest initialization path. When an unsupported
> arch_compat is requested (e.g., Power11 on a Power10 compatibility mode
> host), kvmppc_set_arch_compat() uses cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P11_PVR) to
> detect the mismatch and sets arch_compat to PVR_ARCH_INVALID (0xffffffff).
> This sentinel value is architecturally safe: PAPR specifies that valid
> logical PVR values must have 0x0f as the first byte, ensuring 0xffffffff
> lies permanently outside the specification-defined range. Setting this
> value triggers kvmppc_sanity_check() to mark the vCPU as invalid by
> setting vcpu->arch.sane to false. On the next vCPU run, kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv()
> checks this flag and returns -EINVAL, preventing the guest from running
> with an invalid processor compatibility configuration.
>
> With this, when a Power11 arch_compat is requested on a Power10
> compatibility mode host, the guest fails early during boot with:
>
> error: kvm run failed Invalid argument
>
> This provides a much clearer failure mode compared to the previous
> behavior where the guest could boot in Power11 raw mode (if userspace
> ignored the error) or fail late during H_GUEST_SET_STATE.
>
> Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Testing: Both Anushree and I have tested the below scenarios:
> 1. P11 guest on P11 host - Works
> 2. P10 compat guest on P11 host - Works
> 3. P11 guest on compat-P10 host - Correctly fails with "Invalid argument"
> 4. P10 guest on compat-P10 host - Works
>
Thanks for incorporating all the changes and adding the test result
matrix in the changelog.
The changes looks good, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 16:34 [PATCH v4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 16:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 18:07 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bnye4ue.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.