All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on different TPM banks
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:31:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7dac65691a5848c69009aff7db7fdb2d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1580226042.5088.90.camel@linux.ibm.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mimi Zohar [mailto:zohar@linux.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 4:41 PM
> To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>; linux-
> integrity@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>; James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based
> on different TPM banks
> 
> On Tue, 2020-01-28 at 14:19 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mimi Zohar
> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 5:02 PM
> > > To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>; James Bottomley
> > > <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>; linux-
> > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based
> on
> > > different TPM banks
> > >
> > > Calculating the boot_aggregate attempts to read the TPM SHA1 bank,
> > > assuming it is always enabled.  With TPM 2.0 hash agility, TPM chips
> > > could support multiple TPM PCR banks, allowing firmware to configure
> and
> > > enable different banks.
> > >
> > > Instead of hard coding the TPM 2.0 bank hash algorithm used for
> calculating
> > > the boot-aggregate, see if the configured IMA_DEFAULT_HASH
> algorithm is
> > > an allocated TPM bank, otherwise use the first allocated TPM bank.
> > >
> > > For TPM 1.2 SHA1 is the only supported hash algorithm.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c | 37
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
> > > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
> > > index 7967a6904851..b1b26d61f174 100644
> > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
> > > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c
> > > @@ -656,8 +656,25 @@ static void __init ima_pcrread(u32 idx, struct
> > > tpm_digest *d)
> > >  		pr_err("Error Communicating to TPM chip\n");
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/* tpm2_hash_map is the same as defined in tpm2-cmd.c and
> > > trusted_tpm2.c */
> > > +static struct tpm2_hash tpm2_hash_map[] = {
> > > +	{HASH_ALGO_SHA1, TPM_ALG_SHA1},
> > > +	{HASH_ALGO_SHA256, TPM_ALG_SHA256},
> > > +	{HASH_ALGO_SHA384, TPM_ALG_SHA384},
> > > +	{HASH_ALGO_SHA512, TPM_ALG_SHA512},
> > > +	{HASH_ALGO_SM3_256, TPM_ALG_SM3_256},
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > > - * Calculate the boot aggregate hash
> > > + * The boot_aggregate is a cumulative hash over TPM registers 0 - 7.
> With
> > > + * TPM 2.0 hash agility, TPM chips could support multiple TPM PCR
> banks,
> > > + * allowing firmware to configure and enable different banks.
> > > + *
> > > + * Instead of hard coding the TPM bank hash algorithm used for
> calculating
> > > + * the boot-aggregate, see if the configured IMA_DEFAULT_HASH
> > > algorithm is
> > > + * an allocated TPM bank, otherwise use the first allocated TPM bank.
> > > + *
> > > + * For TPM 1.2 SHA1 is the only hash algorithm.
> > >   */
> > >  static int __init ima_calc_boot_aggregate_tfm(char *digest,
> > >  					      struct crypto_shash *tfm)
> > > @@ -673,6 +690,24 @@ static int __init
> ima_calc_boot_aggregate_tfm(char
> > > *digest,
> > >  	if (rc != 0)
> > >  		return rc;
> > >
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tpm2_hash_map); i++) {
> > > +		if (tpm2_hash_map[i].crypto_id == ima_hash_algo) {
> >
> > It is not necessary to define a new map. ima_tpm_chip->allocated_banks
> > has a crypto_id field.
> 
> Ok, thanks.

When you send the new version, please include patch 1/8 of my patch set,
that sets crypto_id to HASH_ALGO__LAST if there is no mapping between
TPM ID and crypto ID.

Thanks

Roberto

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-28 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-27 16:01 [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot aggregate Mimi Zohar
2020-01-27 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on different TPM banks Mimi Zohar
2020-01-27 16:50   ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-27 18:01     ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-27 20:55     ` Ken Goldman
2020-01-28 14:19   ` Roberto Sassu
2020-01-28 15:40     ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-28 16:31       ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2020-01-29 23:20       ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-30  7:31         ` James Bottomley
2020-01-27 17:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot aggregate Roberto Sassu
2020-01-27 18:16   ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-27 18:35     ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-27 20:49 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-01-27 21:31   ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-29  8:30     ` Petr Vorel
2020-01-29 22:51       ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-30  8:41         ` Petr Vorel
2020-01-30 15:27         ` Roberto Sassu
2020-01-30 15:40           ` Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7dac65691a5848c69009aff7db7fdb2d@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.