From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-188.mta0.migadu.com (out-188.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 266C132D0F5 for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 02:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778813740; cv=none; b=rjdF+X0TNuvt4nu7msMeaJcgFQ7F50E6ueEQ9o8gSNLs+QycUSN8AUQzRtgYs/RDV31vctGuj2leHVv3Gm6elw/5NIH0OaWAnoFWeKrBuEX79+dZbzvykYjSG5qdenDI+RR26gwFmVJOdb3OoT2OwgseKS6Sfn3KhOqKDbvDbuc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778813740; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XmaykSChX/XVGGcxEiutOibJmkv335QMyhf/nK1JzFU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mkTYuOWo/lHCJTZN3b7bppvDBr5IQJGcNIQMEqJtvRlbt7O3xbzqbUURG+P0UBAOQUERUSypPKswvIEcGykpqOZFH59+U971QFNyJyhz9AlJFKYkFMg+jBD/1hi3mV0F5P5oNkeaXa1EezZXzQgN5rdNN+yB190VDzkb/OBA4CE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=jZGNwctj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="jZGNwctj" Message-ID: <7e116785-46b4-4057-848a-090d5bc6779b@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1778813731; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=l961iiLn5/rCGWctYhoQybW6bleT2ATWMNCdAOuze+4=; b=jZGNwctjsfqf5vXA4nsZQCQdUB4tgs+1mW+mJEiL/ztZS3gCGk7MAzmfpExFTKEpSPeEXx AC9AeYtRCp6+Bh+rTLZWndAtY+KugvEgKlQhg2t882H1uPvvj1BhVKcEnPfgry+VcN0AxZ gxbFi5NFLmQbivIDcHkHeNgmntEV9gA= Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 10:55:19 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: neigh: Rename NEIGH_VAR_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME_MS to NEIGH_VAR_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME To: qiu.yutan@zte.com.cn, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang.chuan1@zte.com.cn, huang.jian@zte.com.cn, zhou.shizhen@zte.com.cn, zhang.dongyu1@zte.com.cn, ye.guojin@zte.com.cn, yang.wei20@zte.com.cn, zhang.lin16@zte.com.cn, li.hao40@zte.com.cn References: <20260515101408635T6_cWDYOWVYQleZjRtUS1@zte.com.cn> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Jiayuan Chen In-Reply-To: <20260515101408635T6_cWDYOWVYQleZjRtUS1@zte.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 5/15/26 10:14 AM, qiu.yutan@zte.com.cn wrote: > From: Qiu Yutan > > During the initialization of arp_tbl, the enumeration constant name > NEIGH_VAR_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME_MS in the statement > arp_tbl.parms.data[NEIGH_VAR_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME_MS] = 5*HZ does not > align with its actual meaning (jiffies). I think the macro name NEIGH_VAR_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME is just meant to correspond to the configuration item neigh/default/interval_probe_time_ms. > > Using NEIGH_VAR_INTERVAL_PROBE_TIME is a better naming choice. > > Fixes: bf48c3fae6d7 ("Merge branch 'net-neigh-introduce-interval_probe_time-for-periodic-probe'") Do not carry Fixes tag since it's not a fix. On the other hand, it is a merge commit not a regular commit...