From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9BBC77B78 for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 11:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.47588.1683200716956377574 for ; Thu, 04 May 2023 04:45:17 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="signature has expired" header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=SmTl7QTa; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.128.50, mailfrom: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f315712406so60017315e9.0 for ; Thu, 04 May 2023 04:45:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1683200715; x=1685792715; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Alpt1NpPPpwtn6EU3EJ1z0wiFhqjK0aTnuOaosxAw0E=; b=SmTl7QTaTwA9FonaXfxaUVTGtpkdT9pdlv0KDHEb3nCUDIRzv9796zcZis2iQ0nsqQ 1aBU5R70UzPtg5GlNTqzGNB/GKl/8mdZ6A25nIPjmFHR2B1L1u7xG/Ipn3qHfHvlz26p cCMJSW+oPO1tUvkN0eenxwsF8t+GJW1AAnc5A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683200715; x=1685792715; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Alpt1NpPPpwtn6EU3EJ1z0wiFhqjK0aTnuOaosxAw0E=; b=j4g20BG5M4//iKCwJvhzvSl4Az/1iQ7iT95us+rLi4tw4l8e3hw+baJWJ+s7XUMTH9 X4ieuhaxlMWy1PvvdeyUKFPjGzlK0UKIhwYfaYEV7j3VaX0qfO4YApXR/lkbegZziPxz HFVv/ZqcYV80UU6Zqcz3oy4BFr7I+OcOdgxRUbUNMK2LkI8XXR9HX9pNRAsd168ln94P M+Ozvll9zHR9UNMch51zaxG8pE788a/4/Fh6xPw3orvOTWBsuULlfi66iOX+otv0tkuY PYLn+RaEKopoa14T5SZOo6wbExv2Jah8sUOAEC/L2kn+0U8oriWWgbiMrK46JXcDmBxP agpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwpmSjm/QwlsAmhIjW47AtmUK4/LAoMFEHOWaAFcHL4GKYRHV1x JOVIECbzX7K5kStlZTgjY2OcdJw/GRpz2W+JoRU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6SIaAXCRHxJBwJQvOKE5EJIC6qJCaQyRZ81n5wgO14DNucQTo08D8vmrWlBPBez9kJX1plPg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5689:0:b0:304:7bbf:7c1e with SMTP id f9-20020a5d5689000000b003047bbf7c1emr2180459wrv.4.1683200715438; Thu, 04 May 2023 04:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:6749:5fda:5dc0:e535? ([2001:8b0:aba:5f3c:6749:5fda:5dc0:e535]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a24-20020a05600c225800b003f349d14010sm4749989wmm.38.2023.05.04.04.45.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 May 2023 04:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7fe7561794aa4df74db87f013fc376ece2299888.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-fitimage/uboot-sign: support 64bits address From: Richard Purdie To: Jamin Lin , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 12:45:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20230413103109.5604-1-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com> References: <20230413103109.5604-1-jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.47.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 04 May 2023 11:45:26 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/180867 On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 18:31 +0800, Jamin Lin wrote: > v1: > kernel-fitimage.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells > to support 64bits address > uboot-sign.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells > to support 64bits address. >=20 > Jamin Lin (2): > kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address > uboot-sign: support 64bits address >=20 > meta/classes-recipe/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 6 +++++- > meta/classes-recipe/uboot-sign.bbclass | 6 +++++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Since this adds new variables, could you send patches to the documentation please to document them? I did also wonder if there was some way we could combine and share some of this fit image information since we appear to have two variables with different names encoding the same info here :/. Maybe that is something we could fix or improve in a later patch? I'm kind of living in hope we can simplify some of these different places to share code ultimately. Cheers, Richard