* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-15 4:18 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-15 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki, arm
Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, nm, linux-arm-kernel, olof,
arnd.bergmann, Viresh Kumar, stable
CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
@@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
--
2.2.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-15 4:18 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-15 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
@@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
--
2.2.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
2014-12-15 4:18 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2014-12-15 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-12-15 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: arm, linaro-kernel, linux-pm, nm, linux-arm-kernel, olof,
arnd.bergmann, stable
On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>
> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
OK, so who should be applying this?
> ---
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
> CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
> -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
> +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> @@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
> CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
> -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
> +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-15 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2014-12-15 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>
> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
OK, so who should be applying this?
> ---
> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
> CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
> -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
> +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig
> @@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
> CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
> -CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
> +CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
> CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
2014-12-15 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-12-15 14:42 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-15 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: arm@kernel.org, Lists linaro-kernel, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Nishanth Menon, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
olof@lixom.net, # 3.13.x
On 15 December 2014 at 20:30, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>
>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> OK, so who should be applying this?
I think you can take it..
@Arnd: Any objections ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-15 14:42 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-15 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 15 December 2014 at 20:30, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>
>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> OK, so who should be applying this?
I think you can take it..
@Arnd: Any objections ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
2014-12-15 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2014-12-15 18:50 ` Kevin Hilman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2014-12-15 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Viresh Kumar, arm, linaro-kernel, linux-pm, nm, linux-arm-kernel,
olof, arnd.bergmann, stable
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>
>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> OK, so who should be applying this?
>
Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
v3.19-rc cycle.
Thanks,
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-15 18:50 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2014-12-15 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>
>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> OK, so who should be applying this?
>
Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
v3.19-rc cycle.
Thanks,
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
2014-12-15 18:50 ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2014-12-17 16:01 ` Nishanth Menon
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2014-12-17 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Hilman, Tony Lindgren
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, arm, Linaro Kernel,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Olof Johansson, arnd.bergmann, stable
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
>
>> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>>
>>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
>>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>
>> OK, so who should be applying this?
>>
>
> Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
> I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
>
> Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
> I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
> v3.19-rc cycle.
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-17 16:01 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2014-12-17 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
>
>> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>>
>>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
>>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>
>> OK, so who should be applying this?
>>
>
> Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
> I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
>
> Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
> I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
> v3.19-rc cycle.
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
2014-12-17 16:01 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2014-12-17 16:28 ` Viresh Kumar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-17 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Kevin Hilman, Tony Lindgren, Rafael J. Wysocki, arm@kernel.org,
Linaro Kernel, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olof Johansson,
Arnd Bergmann, # 3.13.x
On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
> wait to go through Tony?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/439
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
@ 2014-12-17 16:28 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-12-17 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
> wait to go through Tony?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/439
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT
2014-12-17 16:28 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2014-12-17 18:28 ` Kevin Hilman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2014-12-17 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Tony Lindgren, Rafael J. Wysocki, arm@kernel.org,
Linaro Kernel, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olof Johansson,
Arnd Bergmann
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes:
> On 17 December 2014 at 21:31, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>> Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
>> wait to go through Tony?
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
>
> I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/439
Right, this was initially planned for v3.19-rc, but since we were
sending another round of pull requests, arm-soc/fixes was included.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-17 18:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-15 4:18 [PATCH] ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT Viresh Kumar
2014-12-15 4:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-15 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-15 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-12-15 14:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-15 14:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-15 18:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-15 18:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-17 16:01 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-17 16:01 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-17 16:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-17 16:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-12-17 18:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-17 18:28 ` Kevin Hilman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.