From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: regression(ti platforms): next-20140210 (ehci?)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:28:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h61omakk9.fsf@paris.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F9117C.8000405@ti.com> (Roger Quadros's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:50:52 +0200")
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
> +devicetree
>
> On 02/10/2014 05:59 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A quick note to report that I saw regression in today's next tag (logs
>> indicate around EHCI) boot on various TI platforms:
>>
>> Note: crane and sdp2430 are not expected to pass with
>> multi_v7_defconfig (note: omap2plus_defconfig boot seems to be sane
>> but USB is disabled there)
>>
>> next-20140210-multi_v7_defconfig
>> 1: am335x-evm: Boot PASS: http://slexy.org/raw/s2zYHdPb94
>> 2: am335x-sk: Boot PASS: http://slexy.org/raw/s2UChLyzSE
>> 3: am3517-evm: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s20Br9XLO1
>> around ehci
>>
>> 4: am37x-evm: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s20mVz9Wc7
>> around ehci
>>
>> 5: am43xx-epos: Boot PASS: http://slexy.org/raw/s2byveBYtT
>> 6: BeagleBoard-XM: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s21sOgJNwK
>> around ehci
>>
>> 7: BeagleBone-Black: Boot PASS: http://slexy.org/raw/s2ovVNAmO7
>> 8: crane: No Image built - Missing platform support?:
>> 9: dra7: Boot PASS: http://slexy.org/raw/s217qwaXsM
>> 10: ldp: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s203IvjE23
>> around ehci
>>
>> 11: PandaBoard-ES: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s2NvkRx2YJ
>> around ehci
>
> I think the problem is that ehci-platform driver gets loaded instead of ehci-omap.
>
> In the DT node we have compatible ids for both. e.g. for omap4.dtsi
>
> usbhsehci: ehci@4a064c00 {
> compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
> reg = <0x4a064c00 0x400>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> };
>
> Shouldn't ehci-omap driver be getting a higher priority than usb-ehci?
>
> A quick fix would be to eliminate "usb-ehci" from the DT node of all failing platforms.
I can confirm that simply remvoing usb-ehci from omap[34].dtsi nodes
fixed the problem for me on 3530/overo, 3730/beagle-xM and
4460/panda-es. But I don't think that's the right fix. First we have
to figure out why ehci-omap stopped getting loaded first.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 15:59 regression(ti platforms): next-20140210 (ehci?) Nishanth Menon
2014-02-10 16:11 ` Roger Quadros
2014-02-10 16:22 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <52F8F77B.70605-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-10 17:50 ` Roger Quadros
2014-02-10 18:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-10 18:16 ` Roger Quadros
2014-02-10 18:28 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2014-02-10 19:33 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-11 1:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-11 13:27 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <7h38jq8nk9.fsf-4poPxKt068f/PtFMR13I2A@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 15:21 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7h61omakk9.fsf@paris.lan \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.