From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes In-Reply-To: <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200") References: <1433771754-4999-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Nicolas Ferre writes: > Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a ?crit : >> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error >> prevents from probing devices correctly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes") >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # 4.1 > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > > Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > > This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so > it's not exactly a regression. > > So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but > it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request > (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet). > > So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this > single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material? I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series. > BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/ Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork collects acks automatically as well. :) Thanks, Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1433771754-4999-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5576BBFD.2060605-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200") Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Ludovic Desroches , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Nicolas Ferre writes: > Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a =C3=A9crit : >> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This er= ror >> prevents from probing devices correctly. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes n= odes") >> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org # 4.1 > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > > Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > > This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, s= o > it's not exactly a regression. > > So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 = but > it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request > (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet). > > So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take th= is > single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material? I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series. > BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/ Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork collects acks automatically as well. :) Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752788AbbFKB5q (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:57:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:33337 "EHLO mail-pd0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751822AbbFKB5h convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:57:37 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Ludovic Desroches , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes References: <1433771754-4999-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200") Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nicolas Ferre writes: > Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a écrit : >> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error >> prevents from probing devices correctly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1 > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > > Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > > This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so > it's not exactly a regression. > > So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but > it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request > (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet). > > So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this > single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material? I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series. > BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/ Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork collects acks automatically as well. :) Thanks, Kevin