From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Kevin Hilman" Subject: Re: next/master baseline: 7 runs, 0 regressions (next-20190717) In-Reply-To: <1ab642a0-0157-84c6-a3a8-da3ead6f55b1@collabora.com> References: <5d2f063d.1c69fb81.64f72.9c8e@mx.google.com> <1ab642a0-0157-84c6-a3a8-da3ead6f55b1@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 10:43:55 -0500 Message-ID: <7ha7dcy8ck.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: To: kernelci@groups.io, guillaume.tucker@gmail.com, kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, kernelci@groups.io Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra "Guillaume Tucker" writes: > On 17/07/2019 12:27, kernelci.org bot wrote: >> next/master baseline: 7 runs, 0 regressions (next-20190717) >> >> Test results summary >> -------------------- >> >> run | platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | errors >> ----+--------------------------+--------+--------------------------+----------+--------------------+------- >> 1 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig | 1/61 >> 2 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig | 1/61 >> 3 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig | 1/61 >> 4 | rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | clang-8 | defconfig | 0/78 >> 5 | rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | clang-8 | defconfig | 0/78 >> 6 | rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | defconfig | 0/78 >> 7 | rk3399-gru-kevin | arm64 | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | defconfig | 0/78 > > There's still an issue with this summary table as the "full" > defconfig is not shown, so there's no way to tell the difference > between runs 1, 2 or 3. In the detailed sections, you can see > that they have CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, CONFIG_EFI=y and CONFIG_SMP=n > on top of the defconfig. > > So it could be reformatted this way: > > > run | platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | errors > ----+--------------------------+--------+--------------------------+----------+---------------------------------------------------+------- > 1 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y+CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y | 1/61 > 2 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n | 1/61 > 3 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig | 1/61 > > > which obviously makes the table quite a bit wider. > > The width of each column is currently fixed but it could be > dynamically computed based on the results to avoid superfluous > spaces: > > run | platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | errors > ----+-------------------+------+---------------+----------+---------------------------------------------------+------- > 1 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y+CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y | 1/61 > 2 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n | 1/61 > 3 | rk3288-veyron-jaq | arm | lab-collabora | gcc-8 | multi_v7_defconfig | 1/61 > > > Is that still readable enough, or does it get so wide that it's > becoming too hard to read? IMO, that's readable, but any more columns, and were going to soon be in the realm of "not useful to view in email" Kevin