From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:03:10 -0800 Message-ID: <7hbnxtwk7l.fsf@paris.lan> References: <1391107002-21470-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> <1391107002-21470-3-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> <7hha7m0x9w.fsf@paris.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Kumar Gala's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:47 -0600") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: linux-arm-msm , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Kumar Gala writes: > On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Kumar Gala writes: >>=20 >>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be >>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/boar= d >>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform. >>>=20 >>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 o= ver >>> to mach-qcom. >>>=20 >>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala >>=20 >> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig cha= nge, >> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name. >>=20 >> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo >> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also? >>=20 >> Kevin > > No reason, just wasn=E2=80=99t aware and no one said anything til now= =2E =20 Yeah, sorry for not reviewiing sooner. > Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup? Yes, we've already merged it, so doing it as a cleanup should be fine. Thanks, Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:03:10 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform In-Reply-To: (Kumar Gala's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:47 -0600") References: <1391107002-21470-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> <1391107002-21470-3-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> <7hha7m0x9w.fsf@paris.lan> Message-ID: <7hbnxtwk7l.fsf@paris.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Kumar Gala writes: > On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Kumar Gala writes: >> >>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be >>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board >>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform. >>> >>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over >>> to mach-qcom. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala >> >> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig change, >> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name. >> >> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo >> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also? >> >> Kevin > > No reason, just wasn?t aware and no one said anything til now. Yeah, sorry for not reviewiing sooner. > Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup? Yes, we've already merged it, so doing it as a cleanup should be fine. Thanks, Kevin