From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MCPM: clarify boot CPU situation wrt CCI Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:35:51 -0700 Message-ID: <7hd2dymiaw.fsf@paris.lan> References: <1403583071-5650-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:41119 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754619AbaFXPfy (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:35:54 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r10so381394pdi.37 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:35:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1403583071-5650-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:11:08 -0400") Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Abhilash Kesavan , Doug Anderson , Andrew Bresticker , Olof Johansson , Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Nicolas Pitre writes: > For the background story, please see: > > http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/thread=32807 > > I sat on those patches for a while but they are the best I could think of > in terms of implementation. To ease merging I suggest I collect all the > ACK's and Tested-by's and submit them all at once to RMK's patch system. Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman Tested-by: Kevin Hilman I tested this series on Exynos5 Peach Pi (a.k.a. 13" ARM Chromebook 2) and verified all 8 cores are booting up. Kevin P.S. FYI for anyone else wanting to try this on peach-pi, I still need a couple other out of tree clock related patches in order to boot fully. Until the final versions are merged, I'm using these: - Doug's aclk66 clock removal for earlyprintk support http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262225.html - Leave mau_epll enabled http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262259.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:35:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] MCPM: clarify boot CPU situation wrt CCI In-Reply-To: <1403583071-5650-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:11:08 -0400") References: <1403583071-5650-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Message-ID: <7hd2dymiaw.fsf@paris.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Nicolas Pitre writes: > For the background story, please see: > > http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/thread=32807 > > I sat on those patches for a while but they are the best I could think of > in terms of implementation. To ease merging I suggest I collect all the > ACK's and Tested-by's and submit them all at once to RMK's patch system. Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman Tested-by: Kevin Hilman I tested this series on Exynos5 Peach Pi (a.k.a. 13" ARM Chromebook 2) and verified all 8 cores are booting up. Kevin P.S. FYI for anyone else wanting to try this on peach-pi, I still need a couple other out of tree clock related patches in order to boot fully. Until the final versions are merged, I'm using these: - Doug's aclk66 clock removal for earlyprintk support http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262225.html - Leave mau_epll enabled http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262259.html