From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:49:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hfvdhyxqi.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546A83D6.9060504@collabora.co.uk> (Javier Martinez Canillas's message of "Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:25:10 +0100")
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> writes:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On 11/17/2014 11:24 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
>> DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>
> I'm sorry for causing a boot failure but when I first posted that patch,
> the Exynos DRM driver was working correctly (at least on the Exynos boards
> I've access to)
Yeah, I tested it at the time as well, so I know it was working.
> so it seems the regression was introduced while the patch
> was posted but not yet picked.
>
> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.
I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: exynos boot falures in linux-next
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:49:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hfvdhyxqi.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546A83D6.9060504@collabora.co.uk> (Javier Martinez Canillas's message of "Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:25:10 +0100")
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> writes:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On 11/17/2014 11:24 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> As might have been expected, reverting the change that enables the
>> DRM/display options in exynos_defconfig fixes the problem.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>
> I'm sorry for causing a boot failure but when I first posted that patch,
> the Exynos DRM driver was working correctly (at least on the Exynos boards
> I've access to)
Yeah, I tested it at the time as well, so I know it was working.
> so it seems the regression was introduced while the patch
> was posted but not yet picked.
>
> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.
I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1XqKYI-0000pQ-4b@ip-10-35-177-41.ec2.internal>
2014-11-17 15:57 ` exynos boot falures in linux-next (was: next boot: 94 boots: 79 pass, 13 fail, 2 untried (next-20141117)) Kevin Hilman
2014-11-17 16:57 ` exynos boot falures in linux-next Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-11-17 16:57 ` Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-11-17 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-17 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-17 23:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-17 23:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-18 2:30 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18 2:30 ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18 3:49 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2014-11-18 3:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-19 17:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20 1:55 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-11-20 1:55 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-12-02 8:32 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-12-02 8:32 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
[not found] ` <7h61ed4xm3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
2014-11-17 18:21 ` mirabox boot fails in linux-next (was: next boot: 94 boots: 79 pass, 13 fail, 2 untried (next-20141117)) Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7hfvdhyxqi.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.