From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 02:21:30 -0700
Subject: [GIT PULL] arm64: Juno: Add support for PCIe or R1 board
In-Reply-To: <20151027101218.GI963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (Liviu
 Dudau's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:12:18 +0000")
References: <20151021113629.GF3394@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <4136958.Qhq5GfeeVa@wuerfel>
 <20151026101256.GF963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20151026235505.GA13221@localhost>
 <20151027101218.GI963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <7hh9lajahx.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:55:05AM +0900, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:12:57AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:42:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 12:36:29 Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > > > The following changes since commit 25cb62b76430a91cc6195f902e61c2cb84ade622:
>> > > > 
>> > > >   Linux 4.3-rc5 (2015-10-11 11:09:45 -0700)
>> > > > 
>> > > > are available in the git repository at:
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > 
>> > > Not pulled.
>> > > 
>> > > All our branches are based on -rc4 or earlier, and we'd like to avoid
>> > > backmerges from mainline if at all possible.
>> > > 
>> > > Can you rebase this to -rc4 and send again?
>> > > 
>> > > 	Arnd
>> > 
>> > Sure, I've rebased the branch on top of -rc4 now, so here is the new request.
>> > 
>> > Many thanks,
>> > Liviu
>> > 
>> > The following changes since commit 049e6dde7e57f0054fdc49102e7ef4830c698b46:
>> > 
>> >   Linux 4.3-rc4 (2015-10-04 16:57:17 +0100)
>> > 
>> > are available in the git repository at:
>> > 
>> >   git://linux-arm.org/linux-ld for-upstream/juno-pcie
>> 
>> This is showing up late by now, but Juno also isn't a high-volume platform
>> so exposure to regressions are limited.
>> 
>> That being said, I really hope we won't have to pick up any fixes for
>> this due to lack of exposure to -next after the merge window.
>> 
>> 
>> Merged into next/arm64.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The PCIe setup has been tested pretty thoroughly (famous last words) inside ARM.
> The only surprises can come from various combinations of bootloaders and the
> kernel, and I'm happy to handle those.
>

FWIW, I've also been testing PCIe on juno-r1.  Unfortunately, it
currently only works with the UEFI loader, but I understand PCIe init is
on it's way upstream in mainline u-boo also, but I haven't been able to
test that yet.

Kevin