From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:14:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7hh9tkooeh.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1426517232-2592-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:34334 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934070AbbCPROd (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:14:33 -0400 Received: by pacwe9 with SMTP id we9so70356061pac.1 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:14:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1426517232-2592-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:47:12 +0100") Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ulf Hansson , Marek Szyprowski , Kukjin Kim , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of > the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match > its "reg" property. Correct it. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Kevin Hilman