All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable boot: 93 boots: 92 pass, 1 fail (v3.17.6)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:45:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7htx16um43.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2553650.3KSUKtTdo3@wuerfel>

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> On Monday 08 December 2014 14:48:20 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> > On Sunday 07 December 2014 21:49:05 Kevin's boot bot wrote:
>> >> Full Build report: http://status.armcloud.us/build/stable/kernel/v3.17.6/
>> >> Full Boot report:  http://status.armcloud.us/boot/all/job/stable/kernel/v3.17.6/
>> >>
>> >> Tree/Branch: stable
>> >> Git describe: v3.17.6
>> >>
>> >> Failed boot tests
>> >> ========>> >>                      emev2-kzm9d:     FAIL:    arm-shmobile_defconfig
>> >>                                       http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.6/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
>> >>
>> >
>> > I tried to look at the reports, but the links don't work. Going
>> > back in the archive, I see that it was still working until v3.17.2,
>> > broken in v3.17.4/.5/.6 and the boot report for v3.17.3 seemed to run
>> > into an unrelated issue. Mainline was always fine since 3.17, only
>> > the stable kernels had problems:
>> >
>> > http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.2/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
>> > http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.3/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
>> > http://storage.armcloud.us/kernel-ci/stable/v3.17.4/arm-shmobile_defconfig/boot-emev2-kzm9d.html
>> >
>> > It may be worth having the sh team investigate the problem some more,
>> > to see if a bad patch made it into stable kernels.
>> 
>> Thanks for telling us!
>> 
>> I don't have a kzm9d, so I'm just guessing based on the evidence.
>> 
>> 1. When comparing successful v3.1.72 with failed v3.17.4, I see:
>> 
>>  Sending DHCP requests ., OK
>> -IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.1.3, my address is 192.168.1.189
>> +IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.1.254, my address is 192.168.1.188
>>  IP-Config: Complete:
>> -     device=eth0, hwaddr\0:01:9b:04:03:cd, ipaddr\x192.168.1.189,
>> mask%5.255.255.0, gw\x192.168.1.254
>> -     host=kzm9d, domain=lan, nis-domain=(none)
>> -     bootserver\x192.168.1.2, rootserver\x192.168.1.2,
>> rootpath=/opt/kjh/rootfs/debian/armel,rsize@96,wsize@96
>> -     nameserver0\x192.168.1.254, nameserver1f.93.87.2,
>> nameserver2!6.231.41.2
>> +     device=eth0, hwaddr\0:01:9b:04:03:cd, ipaddr\x192.168.1.188,
>> mask%5.255.255.0, gw\x192.168.1.254
>> +     host\x192.168.1.188, domain=lan, nis-domain=(none)
>> +     bootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootpath>> +     nameserver0\x192.168.1.254
>>  ALSA device list:
>>    No soundcards found.
>> 
>> So both the client and server IP addresses have changed. Is there a proper NFS
>> root file system available? Mounting of NFS root will time out, but the boot
>> farm management software may time out earlier, so we don't get to see the
>> panic message?
>
> The 3.18-rc7 boot got these:
>
> IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.1.254, my address is 192.168.1.185
> IP-Config: Complete:
>      device=eth0, hwaddr\0:01:9b:04:03:cd, ipaddr\x192.168.1.185, mask%5.255.255.0, gw\x192.168.1.254
>      host\x192.168.1.185, domain=lan, nis-domain=(none)
>      bootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootserver\x192.168.1.254, rootpath>      nameserver0\x192.168.1.254
>
> So it's the same server as the failing config, and yet another client
> address. I'd say it's unlikely to be related.

I figured it out.

The problem is that my DHCP is no longer giving out a default root-path,
and I neglected to update the commandline for this board.  I'd forgotten
that the shmobile_defconfig doesn't have initrd support in v3.17, so it
can't boot from a ramdisk like all my other boards.

Geert, Simon, any objections to enabling initrd support in v3.17 stable?
Probably just asking Greg to cherry-pick mainline commit which does
this[1] should suffice.

Kevin

[1]
commit 874ee23c83d888f8824305c277e047c7799f30b9
Author: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed Aug 13 17:07:15 2014 -0700

    ARM: shmobile: defconfig: enable initrd

    Enable initrd support.

    Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
    [horms+renesas@verge.net.au: dropped enabling atag dtb compat]
    Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>2H


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-08 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-08 11:35 stable boot: 93 boots: 92 pass, 1 fail (v3.17.6) Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 13:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-08 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 16:23 ` Tyler Baker
2014-12-08 16:45 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2014-12-08 17:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-08 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-08 17:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-09  0:27 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7htx16um43.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.