From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.20 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792718811; b=Z92hJZln+jdAUL9VwXf4SLM7M0QBV96IWbHQrZRnprO8S9vbZdf+TXLSpXRmzqAScKXG 9ewAJOKrv37rZ8X7GHBDbbCISR/zVaIG30o2grFSoim5zKF23TXazSjaTzWxNnwnibs87 rgGhTO3z4pFELAjWkFZwqSuF1LuGM1ZbPXGrBKZhZ3dWILUNst3CoUJXdwzV6jmKGmu2O e94FP5/3oic20XWACK7IMd4A/hF1Xf5nxamd4xylQs1nOFwvKHl3zpM41BTwRxIb0+Uf/ c6FuRHsKTrLJeIxkECiWweLijykvVUe/Htyvs8U0rwfDVbnFalFrGp7tEP0URGwo6EA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792718811; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:User-Agent:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=i+Dq1xX2JbtRoMUy7uCTcT6LkM5lHWLzxOvHJKRtw9A=; b=lyNVim8GZv0EUdu0zlwJoA77dve6xTgU7mfR17kVANqkBOoMeuas4bwdiwjZE1lcbz7J 30J5UuF2KTRhzJn2J6rpP21SxaaQP8pZoVZ7TXKzCymvlLyImY3/LASqoHLO1yahwIoXD LUdL3DKhHU3WhgKmw+kK7HwuE75Yg9zOa9ED37DrL9yBX6KIP9NM/M+41ZSrvEJ7VFUb3 SGBycIjnAsO9ujdooykmu/XcWKz7IgWW7uTb/So+FDI0YH4ANWsOYjqLm/X1lyS3KHe71 yTwSdXFVc3/aIvEM/4DrqURJ+pJTx0srjTrZpQLDwTehqjd4qWVLKWGMevt7AqKlqZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=DfTnHtBV; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.20 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-20.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E80606A319 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:26:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 90E80606A319 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=DfTnHtBV X-Envelope-To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=ti0dvJggsUCNbPX0V/0ZNRHupni2ITrw84jVumw0Lso=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792718807; v=1; x=1793323607; b=DfTnHtBVLhhf7i6d90ZJ/oWisyDYTwCW6YX2v8miYlPRQF+Pa6e9leLAIxfqRef1d5hYCpYz uHB0azmwvNXtfR6ll3Lxp3Ldbr3012s1RIUqDr1qgfiEQONyL1jP9sG6qH76I8xyZGMkfqXGA/V TJ3SK1RJxY1Eyix4bjoJqbcU= X-Envelope-To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev Received: by mta11.migadu.com with ESMTPS id e7d5353381a3da34; Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:26:47 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: e7d5353381a3da34 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Roman Gushchin To: Chih-En Lin Cc: sashiko@lists.linux.dev, Chris Mason , rawat10@purdue.edu, pfonseca@purdue.edu Subject: Re: [RFC] new design of review prompts management In-Reply-To: <20261023011616.GA6628@laptop01> (Chih-En Lin's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:16:16 -0400") References: <20261021234442.136214-1-shiyn.lin@gmail.com> <7ia45wyty0ph.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <20261023011616.GA6628@laptop01> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.15; emacs 30.2 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:26:40 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia48q3p2omn.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> X-Mailing-List: sashiko@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Chih-En Lin writes: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 07:50:02PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> Chih-En Lin writes: >> >> > Hi all, >> >> Hello, >> >> Thank you for the proposal! > > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply! > >> Many ideas here resonate with what I was working on/was thinking of >> recently. I'm about to publish a big rework of prompts which separates >> them in auto-generated part and subjective small part for maintainers. > > I wonder if that are: > > https://lore.kernel.org/sashiko/91e21331-ed6d-4ac0-b237-b01aeadca2d1@app.fastmail.com/ > https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts.git subsystem-build Not quite that, but to some extent a step towards the same direction... I'll share it soon. >> It's somewhat close to what you're proposing, but not fully. Let's maybe >> restart this discussion after this? > > Sure :-) > >> I'm sure there will be a ton of room for further improvements... > > We actually have other more ideas (included and not included in [1]) to > improve this type of patch review system, but most of them are based on > the invariant unit. And, since the kernel community has one already, we > are happy to contribute. And this is great!