From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-179.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9722EBB8C for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787348985; cv=none; b=sPLNP5EbrLvJJpNPpuxo428lWAkrL26IV3se31Of4RWhzlmAoxCR3m40nmEw/evUCCpmLC+etLbHkhl5YQledUuXT1z7B8xm8tf9JkiOgkYfgThEvUW2/drPYnabFA2sgEh/Da7dY1OuEBvoJZY99bWnp+qBi3FvWQRN561Aj7A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787348985; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jXeoTgDV4DScDHzGSbrBzBDKi7kiB/EPOD+3RgYwVSI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AyRNMtyj9YBH48UnnKaWtPo01adLbogz6jormBVbYoEjLYKTT2DfAk4k14F2mnMYSd1etJhCv7w5GlAXtkC3GrvCRcM9ZLQITJ69NIpfkUfSzqSkc3F/syjqAxQrIbM5kNo5U29RXdeoVl7McQzmx9eQ1C2peR26S2r68jUxH0k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=wpsHZ5wx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="wpsHZ5wx" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=jXeoTgDV4DScDHzGSbrBzBDKi7kiB/EPOD+3RgYwVSI=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1787348980; v=1; x=1787953780; b=wpsHZ5wxUn9SuEsChlSrF+9hOEiMfV+WAZ2+mLD/vQDwTqpy+vNPwj1LAX3vJlaFHaehKqzL EStrxeBG1afrYdwZWj7PVUNzPYLQxNTYAP8Od7XipMcoBLjKZxnpk5lJQWF3FvHrryLEoKPwjlx jkxy9kLDMWHu6VB2GTwMp4kk= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from castle.c.googlers.com (35.203.187.139) by mta12.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 64ae4fc1d4dbb56e; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:30 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 64ae4fc1d4dbb56e X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Roman Gushchin To: John Hubbard Cc: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" , Michal Hocko , Ridong Chen , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , David Hildenbrand , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Kairui Song , Barry Song , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ridong Chen Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type In-Reply-To: <67fc54f3-8889-4e18-b72c-e14266bd4703@nvidia.com> (John Hubbard's message of "Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:44:14 -0700") References: <20260821081741.1340277-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev> <7ia4tsonw41j.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <67fc54f3-8889-4e18-b72c-e14266bd4703@nvidia.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.15; emacs 30.2 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:49:26 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4ecfrywih.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain John Hubbard writes: > On 8/21/26 2:35 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" writes: >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > ...>> We already had _too much work_ prior to the slopgeddon. Now we have a multiple >>> of that. >>> >>> Roman - I really think we a way of switching off the 'unrelated to your patch >>> but' stuff per-subsystem would be useful. >> >> I thought about it, but switching it off completely looks dubious to >> me. So maybe moderating it a bit can help? Like not reporting completely >> unrelated issues or at least do not report them more than once? > > Or, reporting them *once*, and not as a reply to the patch! > > After all, it's "unrelated to your patch". So then, don't pollute that > patch's review thread, right? > > That would alleviate the most infuriating part of this cycle, imho. Yes, this sounds good to me, it requires quite some work on the sashiko side, so I can't promise it tomorrow, but hopefully in few weeks. Thanks