From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jari Aalto Subject: Re: [PATCH] --format=pretty: new modifiers cID, cIS, CIY Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:15:38 +0200 Organization: Private Message-ID: <7iho6tvp.fsf@blue.sea.net> References: <7vir188ej4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 02 02:21:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JL742-0005Ef-OJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:21:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759655AbYBBBUK (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:20:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759558AbYBBBUK (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:20:10 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:53346 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755276AbYBBBUI (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:20:08 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JL735-0007Ss-1K for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:20:03 +0000 Received: from a91-155-183-103.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.155.183.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:20:03 +0000 Received: from jari.aalto by a91-155-183-103.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:20:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-155-183-103.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8G4Tmbdi02QLe17IgqeMm4eFzME= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Fri 2008-02-01 Junio C Hamano > But I do not like the idea of adding more short-hand format this > way. I'd welcome if this mimimum set of ISO date handling woudl be included, because I feel they address the needs more versatily than the current %ci, which is too long with down to TZ. I find it that the YYY-MM-DD HH:MM meets the needs 99% of the case, like in ls(1) listing when the LC_* is properly configured. [extensible syntax] > %c(name|initial) %c(time|local,HH:MM) %c(time|gmt,HH) <%c(email)> This would be good. In the mean time, when we wait for this feature to surface, the current patch would address immediate needs. Jari -- Welcome to FOSS revolution: we fix and modify until it shines