From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rebasing trouble
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:12:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v3bdno39b.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629234502.GB10041@fieldses.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:45:02 -0400")
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
> I don't know why I find that syntax so counterintuitive. Something like
>
> git checkout -b newgood master
> git cherry-pick next..good
>
> would seem more obvious.
Yes. Everybody loves to hate this syntax.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-30 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 19:47 rebasing trouble J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-29 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-29 20:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-29 20:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-29 21:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-29 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-06-29 23:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-06-30 1:12 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v3bdno39b.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.