From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Gernoth <simigern@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] archive: specfile support (--pretty=format: in archive files)
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:19:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v642qm0aw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46DDE6B3.8010507@lsrfire.ath.cx> (René Scharfe's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:13:55 +0200")
René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
> Here's that ugly code, by the way. It adds two placeholders, %d for
> description and %D for description depth. Shortcomings of this code:
> it adds three members to struct commit, it unconditionally computes
> the description when format_commit_message() -- even if the format
> string doesn't contain %d and %D, the patch is not nicely split up.
> But it convinced me that describe *can* indeed be librarified. :-)
Yeah, unconditional computation for %d/%D is really a killer.
Otherwise the change itself does not necessarily look too ugly,
though.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-05 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-03 18:07 [PATCH 2/3] archive: specfile support (--pretty=format: in archive files) René Scharfe
2007-09-03 18:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-03 20:19 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-04 23:13 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-03 23:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-04 5:45 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-09-04 10:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-04 23:13 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-05 0:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-05 0:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-06 16:20 ` [PATCH 4/3] archive: specfile syntax change: "$Format:%PLCHLDR$" instead of just "%PLCHLDR" René Scharfe
2007-09-06 17:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 20:35 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-06 20:53 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-06 23:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07 10:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 22:32 ` [PATCH 3.5/3] add memmem() René Scharfe
2007-09-06 22:34 ` [PATCH 4/3] archive: specfile syntax change: "$Format:%PLCHLDR$" instead of just "%PLCHLDR" (take 2) René Scharfe
2007-09-06 16:51 ` [PATCH 5/3] archive: rename attribute specfile to export-subst René Scharfe
2007-09-06 17:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 20:38 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-06 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07 10:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-04 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] archive: specfile support (--pretty=format: in archive files) René Scharfe
2007-09-05 0:19 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v642qm0aw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=simigern@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.