From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor clarifications in diffcore documentation Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:15:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7v64rg3nuq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 29 07:17:34 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVj4O-0003lW-4s for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:15:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751324AbVJ2FPo (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:15:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751332AbVJ2FPn (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:15:43 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:40153 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751324AbVJ2FPn (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:15:43 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051029051457.NHWE2059.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:14:57 -0400 To: c.shoemaker@cox.net In-Reply-To: (c. shoemaker's message of "Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:15:49 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: c.shoemaker@cox.net writes: > ------------------------------------------------ > :100644 100644 0123456... 1234567... M fileY > -:000000 100644 0000000... 0123456... A file0 > +:000000 100644 0000000... bcd3456... A file0 > ------------------------------------------------ > > the original contents of fileY and the resulting contents of > @@ -154,14 +165,14 @@ changed to: > > ------------------------------------------------ > :100644 100644 0123456... 1234567... M fileY > -:100644 100644 0123456... 0123456... C100 fileY file0 > +:100644 100644 0123456... bcd3456... C100 fileY file0 > ------------------------------------------------ I think with this change you wanted to say that a copy does not have to be a literal copy but a copy-edit. But if that is the case, I suspect that the similarity index would be slightly less than 100. If I misunderstood the reason of this change please let me know. All patches, including this one, look fine to me. Thanks.