From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: bug related to branches using / in name Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:57:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7icakvgd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1214509350.28344.31.camel@odie.local> <20080627030245.GA7144@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080627035747.GC7144@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vtzfemp4d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080628041841.GA9451@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Simon Holm =?utf-8?Q?Th=C3=B8gersen?= , git@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 28 06:58:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KCSWQ-0006jz-1B for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 06:58:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751909AbYF1E5w (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:57:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751951AbYF1E5w (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:57:52 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:59347 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751635AbYF1E5v (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:57:51 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0160F11171; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:57:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EC891116D; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:57:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080628041841.GA9451@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:18:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C0D209C6-44CE-11DD-A81F-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > As as long your "equivalent of" means "branch -d"; we need to kill off > both the ref and its reflogs. And therefore... > ... > The one key difference between rewinds and branch deletion is that the > latter will kill off the reflog, making the history inaccessible. You > can always still access rewound or rebased work via the reflog. Hmm, you are right. I somehow still had a vague distant memory from late 2006 when we did not have reflogs for remotes/ hierarchy.