From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Teach mailsplit about Maildir's Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7ir3mjfa.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070520181447.GA10638@ferdyx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: "Fernando J. Pereda" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 20 20:36:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpqGc-0003v1-ES for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 20:36:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757583AbXETSg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2007 14:36:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759359AbXETSg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2007 14:36:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:56383 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758727AbXETSg0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 May 2007 14:36:26 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070520183625.BJLK13995.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 20 May 2007 14:36:25 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1WcR1X00D1kojtg0000000; Sun, 20 May 2007 14:36:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070520181447.GA10638@ferdyx.org> (Fernando J. Pereda's message of "Sun, 20 May 2007 20:14:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Fernando J. Pereda" writes: > Signed-off-by: Fernando J. Pereda > --- > > I never got ACK or NACK when I sent it the first time, that's why > I'm resending this one with (almost) no changes. Sorry, I had a (n obviously false) impression that you retracted this patch due to this: > ... > +IMPORTANT: Maildir splitting relies upon filenames being sorted to output > +patches in the correct order. I am sure there are many users who uses Maildir layout on this list. Happy with this patch? Please speak out.