From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] user-manual: Use "git config --global" instead of editing ~/.gitconfig Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:04:52 -0700 Message-ID: <7v7irgibcr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200705102353.31821.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johan Herland X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 11 00:05:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HmGlF-0004rX-1o for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 00:05:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755268AbXEJWFQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 18:05:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759332AbXEJWFP (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 18:05:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:33692 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755656AbXEJWFO (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 18:05:14 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070510220459.DZA13903.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 10 May 2007 18:05:08 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id xa4s1W00u1kojtg0000000; Thu, 10 May 2007 18:04:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200705102353.31821.johan@herland.net> (Johan Herland's message of "Thu, 10 May 2007 23:53:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I think this was rejected before, and the reason was that the point of this section is to make users aware that what novices might think is internal is actually represented in a very simple to understand and simple to change format, and reassure people that making small mistakes can be fixed with an editor. And I think that reasoning still stands.